Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29037234›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Women's attitudes, experiences and compliance concerning the use of Mindfetalness- a method for systematic observation of fetal movements in late pregnancy.

Anna Akselsson, Susanne Georgsson, Helena Lindgren, Karin Pettersson, Ingela Rådestad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02865759 (Empowering Women to Shorten Pre-hospital Delay After Decreased Fetal Movements and Simultaneously Lower the Frequency of Unwarranted Visits - a Randomized Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02865759 nacompletednot on this map

Empowering Women to Shorten Pre-hospital Delay After Decreased Fetal Movements and Simultaneously Lower the Frequency of Unwarranted Visits - a Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSophiahemmet UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled39,000ConditionsPregnancy OutcomesArmsMindfetalness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna AkselssonSophiahemmet University and Department of women and Child's Health, Karolinska Institutet, PB 5605, S-114 86, Stockholm, Sweden. anna.akselsson@shh.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-217X
Susanne GeorgssonSophiahemmet University and Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helena LindgrenDepartment of Women and Child's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin PetterssonDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ingela RådestadSophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sophiahemmet University College · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal perception of decreased fetal movements and low awareness of fetal movements are associated with a negative birth outcome. Mindfetalness is a method developed for women to facilitate systematic observations of the intensity, character and frequency of fetal movements in late pregnancy. We sought to explore women's attitudes, experiences and compliance in using Mindfetalness.

methodsWe enrolled 104 pregnant women treated at three maternity clinics in Stockholm, Sweden, from February to July of 2016. We educated 104 women in gestational week 28-32 by providing information about fetal movements and how to practice Mindfetalness. Each was instructed to perform the assessment daily for 15 min. At each subsequent follow-up, the midwife collected information regarding their perceptions of Mindfetalness, and their compliance. Content analyses, descriptive and analytic statistics were used in the analysis of data.

resultsOf the women, 93 (89%) were positive towards Mindfetalness and compliance was high 78 (75%). Subjective responses could be binned into one of five categories: Decreased worry, relaxing, creating a relationship, more knowledge about the unborn baby and awareness of the unborn baby. Eleven (11%) women had negative perceptions of Mindfetalness, citing time, and the lack of need for a method to observe fetal movements as the most common reasons.

conclusionWomen in late pregnancy are generally positive about Mindfetalness and their compliance with daily use is high. The technique helped them to be more aware of, and create a relationship with, their unborn baby. Mindfetalness can be a useful tool in antenatal care. However, further study is necessary in order to determine whether the technique is able to reduce the incidence of negative birth outcome.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultFemaleFetal MonitoringFetal MovementGestational AgeHumansMindfulnessPatient CompliancePerceptionPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdPrenatal CareSwedenYoung AdultAttitudeComplianceFetal movementsMindfetalnessRelationship

Identifiers

PMID29037234
PMCPMC5644086
OpenAlexW2765700507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.