ArticleBMC public health2017
Ideas, actors and institutions: lessons from South Australian Health in All Policies on what encourages other sectors' involvement.
Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multisectoral interventions and health system performance: a systematic review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024Pooled it
- Promoting children's sleep health: Intervention Mapping meets Health in All Policies.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- The future of public health policymaking after COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review of lessons from Health in All Policies.Open research Europe · 2021Pooled it
- Our Healthy Community Conceptual Framework and Intervention Model for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Municipalities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Health in All Policies at the Local Level: What Facilitates Success? Comment on "A Realist Explanatory Case Study Investigating How Common Goals, Leadership, and Committed Staff Facilitate Health in All Policies Implementation in the Municipality of Kuopio, Finland".International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- A Food Relief Charter for South Australia-Towards a Shared Vision for Pathways Out of Food Insecurity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Addressing Policy Coherence Between Health in All Policies Approach and the Sustainable Development Goals Implementation: Insights From Kenya.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Review
- Aligning healthcare, public health and social services: A scoping review of the role of purpose, governance, finance and data.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Policy Adoption and the Implementation Woes of the Intersectoral First 1000 Days of Childhood Initiative, In the Western Cape Province of South Africa.International journal of health policy and management · 2021Article
- Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review.Health policy and planning · 2021Review
- Promoting Intersectoral Collaboration Through the Evaluations of Public Health Interventions: Insights From Key Informants in 6 European Countries.International journal of health policy and management · 2021Article
- Implementing without guidelines, learning at the coalface: a case study of health promoters in an era of community health workers in South Africa.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Designing a toolkit for the assessment of Health in All Policies at a national scale in Iran.Health promotion perspectives · 2020Article
- Creating a whole-of-government approach to promoting healthy weight: What can Health in All Policies contribute?International journal of public health · 2019Article
- To what extent can the activities of the South Australian Health in All Policies initiative be linked to population health outcomes using a program theory-based evaluation?BMC public health · 2019Article
- Ideas for Extending the Approach to Evaluating Health in All Policies in South Australia Comment on "Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia".International journal of health policy and management · 2018Article
- Correction to: Ideas, actors and institutions: lessons from South Australian Health in All Policies on what encourages other sectors' involvement.BMC public health · 2017Article
- Health in All Policies in South Australia-Did It Promote and Enact an Equity Perspective?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper examines the extent to which actors from sectors other than health engaged with the South Australian Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiative, determines why they were prepared to do so and explains the mechanisms by which successful engagement happened. This examination applies theories of policy development and implementation.
methodsThe paper draws on a five year study of the implementation of HiAP comprising document analysis, a log of key events, detailed interviews with 64 policy actors and two surveys of public servants.
resultsThe findings are analysed within an institutional policy analysis framework and examine the extent to which ideas, institutional factors and actor agency influenced the willingness of actors from other sectors to work with Health sector staff under the HiAP initiative. In terms of ideas, there was wide acceptance of the role of social determinants in shaping health and the importance of action to promote health in all government agencies. The institutional environment was initially supportive, but support waned over the course of the study when the economy in South Australia became less buoyant and a health minister less supportive of health promotion took office. The existence of a HiAP Unit was very helpful for gaining support from other sectors. A new Public Health Act offered some promise of institutionalising the HiAP approach and ideas. The analysis concludes that a key factor was the operation of a supportive network of public servants who promoted HiAP, including some who were senior and influential.
conclusionsThe South Australian case study demonstrates that despite institutional constraints and shifting political support within the health sector, HiAP gained traction in other sectors. The key factors that encouraged the commitment of others sectors to HiAP were the existence of a supportive, knowledgeable policy network, political support, institutionalisation of the ideas and approach, and balancing of the economic and social goals of government.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.