Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29037182›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Ideas, actors and institutions: lessons from South Australian Health in All Policies on what encourages other sectors' involvement.

Fran Baum, Toni Delany-Crowe, Colin MacDougall, Angela Lawless, Helen van Eyk, Carmel Williams

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Food Relief Charter for South Australia-Towards a Shared Vision for Pathways Out of Food Insecurity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Health in All Policies in South Australia-Did It Promote and Enact an Equity Perspective?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fran BaumSouthgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. fran.baum@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2294-1368
Toni Delany-CroweSouthgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Colin MacDougallSouthgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Angela LawlessCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Helen van EykSouthgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Carmel WilliamsHealth Determinants and Policy, Department for Health and Ageing, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper examines the extent to which actors from sectors other than health engaged with the South Australian Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiative, determines why they were prepared to do so and explains the mechanisms by which successful engagement happened. This examination applies theories of policy development and implementation.

methodsThe paper draws on a five year study of the implementation of HiAP comprising document analysis, a log of key events, detailed interviews with 64 policy actors and two surveys of public servants.

resultsThe findings are analysed within an institutional policy analysis framework and examine the extent to which ideas, institutional factors and actor agency influenced the willingness of actors from other sectors to work with Health sector staff under the HiAP initiative. In terms of ideas, there was wide acceptance of the role of social determinants in shaping health and the importance of action to promote health in all government agencies. The institutional environment was initially supportive, but support waned over the course of the study when the economy in South Australia became less buoyant and a health minister less supportive of health promotion took office. The existence of a HiAP Unit was very helpful for gaining support from other sectors. A new Public Health Act offered some promise of institutionalising the HiAP approach and ideas. The analysis concludes that a key factor was the operation of a supportive network of public servants who promoted HiAP, including some who were senior and influential.

conclusionsThe South Australian case study demonstrates that despite institutional constraints and shifting political support within the health sector, HiAP gained traction in other sectors. The key factors that encouraged the commitment of others sectors to HiAP were the existence of a supportive, knowledgeable policy network, political support, institutionalisation of the ideas and approach, and balancing of the economic and social goals of government.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAustraliaHealth PromotionHumansPolicy MakingPublic SectorSocial TheorySouth AustraliaSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth in All PoliciesInstitutional theoryIntersectoral collaborationSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID29037182
PMCPMC5644129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.