ArticleJournal of endourology2017
Outcome of Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: Does Antiplatelet Therapy Really Matter? Analysis of a Retrospective Series.
Article in Journal of endourology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Aspirin Use Be Associated With the Risk or Prognosis of Bladder Cancer? A Case-Control Study and Meta-analytic Assessment.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Review
- Antiplatelet therapy and bladder tumor resection.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Article
- Dealing with perioperative antiplatelet treatment for transurethral resection of the bladder: primum non nocere.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Article
- Risk of postoperative bleeding and thromboembolic events in anticoagulated patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumors.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTransurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is considered to be at a moderate or high risk of bleeding during surgical procedure. The number of patients on antiplatelet (AP) drugs has been increasing; we wanted to assess their impact on the outcome of patients undergoing scheduled TURBT. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective assessment of noninferiority of 450 consecutive procedures performed between April 2013 and June 2015 was conducted. Patients were divided in two groups: naive or AP drug users. The primary endpoint was the average length of stay (ALOS). Noninferiority was set at 1 day. A subgroup analysis comparing the acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) group and clopidogrel group to the naive group was performed. Multivariate analysis was performed to find the determinants of a longer ALOS. Chi-square or Fisher tests were used to analyze categorical variables, and Student's or Mann-Whitney tests were used to analyze quantitative variables.
resultsWe included 325 patients who underwent TURBT: 117 received AP drugs (ASA, 85; clopidogrel, 32) and 208 were naive to AP drugs (of whom 117 were consecutively analyzed). The ALOSs were 2.5 days (naive group) and 2.9 days (AP group). The subgroup analysis showed ALOSs of 2.6 days (ASA group) and 3.7 days (clopidogrel group). Clopidogrel therapy (odds ratio = 4.1 [1.7-9.6]) and the duration and depth of resection emerged as determinants of a longer ALOS in multivariate analysis. Perioperative management of AP therapies was achieved according to recommended practices.
conclusionsThe ALOS of patients receiving AP drugs was not clinically different from naive patients. This result was identical for patients receiving ASA. However, clopidogrel increased the length of stay, making us question its use in perioperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29037064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.