Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29036644›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heredity2017

Roles of Female and Male Genotype in Post-Mating Responses in Drosophila melanogaster.

Sofie Y N Delbare, Clement Y Chow, Mariana F Wolfner, Andrew G Clark

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heredity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The life history ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. TheG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sofie Y N DelbareDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2703.
Clement Y ChowDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2703.
Mariana F WolfnerDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2703.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2703.
Cornell University · US

Funding

TAKASHIMA DIVERSITY SUPPLEMENT TO: REGULATION OF GAMETE USE AND NEURAL PATHWAYS IN REPRODUCTIONR01HD059060 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREW G CLARK, Mariana Federica Wolfner · 2009 to 2026
$5.8M
Reproductive Sciences and Genomics Training ProgramT32HD052471 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERSON, MARK S · 2007 to 2016
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059060NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating induces a multitude of changes in female behavior, physiology, and gene expression. Interactions between female and male genotype lead to variation in post-mating phenotypes and reproductive success. So far, few female molecules responsible for these interactions have been identified. Here, we used Drosophila melanogaster from 5 geographically dispersed populations to investigate such female × male genotypic interactions at the female transcriptomic and phenotypic levels. Females from each line were singly-mated to males from the same 5 lines, for a total of 25 combinations. Reproductive output and refractoriness to re-mating were assayed in females from the 25 mating combinations. Female × male genotypic interactions resulted in significant differences in these post-mating phenotypes. To assess whether female × male genotypic interactions affect the female post-mating transcriptome, next-generation RNA sequencing was performed on virgin and mated females at 5 to 6 h post-mating. Seventy-seven genes showed strong variation in mating-induced expression changes in a female × male genotype-dependent manner. These genes were enriched for immune response and odorant-binding functions, and for expression exclusively in the head. Strikingly, variation in post-mating transcript levels of a gene encoding a spermathecal endopeptidase was correlated with short-term egg production. The transcriptional variation found in specific functional classes of genes might be a read-out of female × male compatibility at a molecular level. Understanding the roles these genes play in the female post-mating response will be crucial to better understand the evolution of post-mating responses and related conflicts between the sexes.

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsCrosses, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenes, InsectGenotypeMalePhenotypeReproductionTranscriptomefemale × male genotype interactionsGlobal Diversity Linesimmune systemreproductionsexual conflicttranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29036644
PMCPMC5892397
OpenAlexW2761269889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.