Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29036626›Full record

ArticleLaboratory medicine2017

Detection of an Underlying 22q11.2 Duplication in a Female Neonate With Trisomy 18.

Donald E Turbiville, Hai Wu, Jianli Dong

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donald E TurbivilleSchool of Medicine.
Hai WuDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Jianli DongDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current guidelines indicate that in patients with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies, chromosomal microarray (CMA) is a first-tier diagnostic test. However, for patients with obvious chromosomal syndromes such as trisomy 13, 18, and 21, G-banded karyotyping is still recommended over CMA for establishing a diagnosis. In the case presented herein, a female neonate was suspected of having trisomy 18 based on pre- and postnatal evaluations. Karyotyping was requested but not performed due to insufficient cell growth; Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (i-FISH) found an extra copy of chromosome 18. CMA analysis uncovered gain of chromosome 18 and an additional duplication in chromosome 22q11.2, which went undetected with FISH. Our patient died within 40 hours after birth, but it is expected that patients with recognizable chromosomal syndromes could benefit from the discovery of coexisting copy number variations (CNVs) using CMA. This case shows that CMA can be a useful test for patients with recognizable chromosomal syndromes because of the potential benefits for patients and their families when co-existing CNVs are found.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, MultipleChromosome DuplicationDiGeorge SyndromeTrisomy 18 SyndromeChromosomes, Human, Pair 22FemaleGenetic TestingHumansInfant, NewbornIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis22q11.2 duplication syndromeCNVcopy number variationtrisomy 18whole genome chromosomal microarray

Identifiers

PMID29036626
PMCPMC5907902
OpenAlexW2757414886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.