ArticleLaboratory medicine2017
Detection of an Underlying 22q11.2 Duplication in a Female Neonate With Trisomy 18.
Article in Laboratory medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromosome 22q11.2 Microduplication Syndrome: A Review of the Literature and 12 New Cases.Genes · 2026Review
- Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Cultured Amniotic Fluid Cells Reveals Complex Gene Expression Alterations in Human Fetuses With Trisomy 18.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current guidelines indicate that in patients with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies, chromosomal microarray (CMA) is a first-tier diagnostic test. However, for patients with obvious chromosomal syndromes such as trisomy 13, 18, and 21, G-banded karyotyping is still recommended over CMA for establishing a diagnosis. In the case presented herein, a female neonate was suspected of having trisomy 18 based on pre- and postnatal evaluations. Karyotyping was requested but not performed due to insufficient cell growth; Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (i-FISH) found an extra copy of chromosome 18. CMA analysis uncovered gain of chromosome 18 and an additional duplication in chromosome 22q11.2, which went undetected with FISH. Our patient died within 40 hours after birth, but it is expected that patients with recognizable chromosomal syndromes could benefit from the discovery of coexisting copy number variations (CNVs) using CMA. This case shows that CMA can be a useful test for patients with recognizable chromosomal syndromes because of the potential benefits for patients and their families when co-existing CNVs are found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.