Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29036624›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heredity2017

Genomic Signatures of Sexual Conflict.

Katja R Kasimatis, Thomas C Nelson, Patrick C Phillips

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heredity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex-Specific Dominance of Gene Expression in Seed Beetles.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Evolution of sex-biased genes inEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nonadaptive molecular evolution of seminal fluid proteins in Drosophila.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katja R KasimatisInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon,Eugene, OR 97403,USA.
Thomas C NelsonInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon,Eugene, OR 97403,USA.
Patrick C PhillipsInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon,Eugene, OR 97403,USA.
University of Oregon · US

Funding

Graduate Training in Genetics Administrative Supplement - Career Curriculum DevelopmentT32GM007413 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI GUILLEMIN, KAREN J · 1985 to 2022
$7.8M
Systems genetics of natural variation in stress response pathwaysR01GM102511 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PHILLIPS, PATRICK C. · 2015 to 2018
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102511NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual conflict is a specific class of intergenomic conflict that describes the reciprocal sex-specific fitness costs generated by antagonistic reproductive interactions. The potential for sexual conflict is an inherent property of having a shared genome between the sexes and, therefore, is an extreme form of an environment-dependent fitness effect. In this way, many of the predictions from environment-dependent selection can be used to formulate expected patterns of genome evolution under sexual conflict. However, the pleiotropic and transmission constraints inherent to having alleles move across sex-specific backgrounds from generation to generation further modulate the anticipated signatures of selection. We outline methods for detecting candidate sexual conflict loci both across and within populations. Additionally, we consider the ability of genome scans to identify sexually antagonistic loci by modeling allele frequency changes within males and females due to a single generation of selection. In particular, we highlight the need to integrate genotype, phenotype, and functional information to truly distinguish sexual conflict from other forms of sexual differentiation.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessSelection, GeneticAllelesAnimalsEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic LociGenetic PleiotropyLinkage DisequilibriumMaleModels, GeneticReproductiongenome evolutioninterlocus sexual conflictintersexual genetic covarianceintralocus sexual conflictlinkage disequilibriumpleiotropy

Identifiers

PMID29036624
PMCPMC5892400
OpenAlexW2759323355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.