Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29036581›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

Secondary use of electronic health record data for clinical workflow analysis.

Michelle R Hribar, Sarah Read-Brown, Isaac H Goldstein, Leah G Reznick, Lorinna Lombardi, Mansi Parikh, Winston Chamberlain, Michael F Chiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024
    Review
  7. Effects of a QI intervention on pediatric asthma treatment using patient outcomes and workflow in an emergency department.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Predicting next-day discharge via electronic health record access logs.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michelle R HribarDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Sarah Read-BrownDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Isaac H GoldsteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Leah G ReznickDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Lorinna LombardiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Mansi ParikhDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Winston ChamberlainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Michael F ChiangDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Kate E Keller · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Modeling and Optimization of Clinical Processes Using EHR DataR00LM012238 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HRIBAR, MICHELLE · 2017 to 2019
$672k
Modeling and Optimization of Clinical Processes Using EHR DataK99LM012238 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HRIBAR, MICHELLE · 2015 to 2016
$178k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NLM NIH HHS K99 LM012238NLM NIH HHS R00 LM012238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Outpatient clinics lack guidance for tackling modern efficiency and productivity demands. Workflow studies require large amounts of timing data that are prohibitively expensive to collect through observation or tracking devices. Electronic health records (EHRs) contain a vast amount of timing data - timestamps collected during regular use - that can be mapped to workflow steps. This study validates using EHR timestamp data to predict outpatient ophthalmology clinic workflow timings at Oregon Health and Science University and demonstrates their usefulness in 3 different studies. Materials and Methods: Four outpatient ophthalmology clinics were observed to determine their workflows and to time each workflow step. EHR timestamps were mapped to the workflow steps and validated against the observed timings. Results: The EHR timestamp analysis produced times that were within 3 min of the observed times for >80% of the appointments. EHR use patterns affected the accuracy of using EHR timestamps to predict workflow times. Discussion: EHR timestamps provided a reasonable approximation of workflow and can be used for workflow studies. They can be used to create simulation models, analyze EHR use, and quantify the impact of trainees on workflow. Conclusion: The secondary use of EHR timestamp data is a valuable resource for clinical workflow studies. Sample timestamp data files and algorithms for processing them are provided and can be used as a template for more studies in other clinical specialties and settings.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationElectronic Health RecordsWorkflowAlgorithmsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansOphthalmologycomputer simulationelectronic health recordssecondary use of electronic health record dataworkflow

Identifiers

PMID29036581
PMCPMC6080808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.