ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2018
A two-stage approach of gene network analysis for high-dimensional heterogeneous data.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint gene network construction by single-cell RNA sequencing data.Biometrics · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gaussian graphical models have been widely used to construct gene regulatory networks from gene expression data. Most existing methods for Gaussian graphical models are designed to model homogeneous data, assuming a single Gaussian distribution. In practice, however, data may consist of gene expression studies with unknown confounding factors, such as study cohort, microarray platforms, experimental batches, which produce heterogeneous data, and hence lead to false positive edges or low detection power in resulting network, due to those unknown factors. To overcome this problem and improve the performance in constructing gene networks, we propose a two-stage approach to construct a gene network from heterogeneous data. The first stage is to perform a clustering analysis in order to assign samples to a few clusters where the samples in each cluster are approximately homogeneous, and the second stage is to conduct an integrative analysis of networks from each cluster. In particular, we first apply a model-based clustering method using the singular value decomposition for high-dimensional data, and then integrate the networks from each cluster using the integrative $\psi$-learning method. The proposed method is based on an equivalent measure of partial correlation coefficients in Gaussian graphical models, which is computed with a reduced conditional set and thus it is useful for high-dimensional data. We compare the proposed two-stage learning approach with some existing methods in various simulation settings, and demonstrate the robustness of the proposed method. Finally, it is applied to integrate multiple gene expression studies of lung adenocarcinoma to identify potential therapeutic targets and treatment biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.