Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29036464›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

The MIMIC Code Repository: enabling reproducibility in critical care research.

Alistair Ew Johnson, David J Stone, Leo A Celi, Tom J Pollard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 215 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
215citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

215 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

155 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alistair Ew JohnsonMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
David J StoneUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Leo A CeliMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tom J PollardMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Integrating Data, Models, and Reasoning in Critical CareR01EB001659 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2003 to 2012
$9.8M
Research Resource for Complex Physiologic SignalsR01GM104987 · NIGMS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GOLDBERGER, ARY LOUIS, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2012 to 2019
$5.8M
Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001659NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Lack of reproducibility in medical studies is a barrier to the generation of a robust knowledge base to support clinical decision-making. In this paper we outline the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) Code Repository, a centralized code base for generating reproducible studies on an openly available critical care dataset. Materials and Methods: Code is provided to load the data into a relational structure, create extractions of the data, and reproduce entire analysis plans including research studies. Results: Concepts extracted include severity of illness scores, comorbid status, administrative definitions of sepsis, physiologic criteria for sepsis, organ failure scores, treatment administration, and more. Executable documents are used for tutorials and reproduce published studies end-to-end, providing a template for future researchers to replicate. The repository's issue tracker enables community discussion about the data and concepts, allowing users to collaboratively improve the resource. Discussion: The centralized repository provides a platform for users of the data to interact directly with the data generators, facilitating greater understanding of the data. It also provides a location for the community to collaborate on necessary concepts for research progress and share them with a larger audience. Consistent application of the same code for underlying concepts is a key step in ensuring that research studies on the MIMIC database are comparable and reproducible. Conclusion: By providing open source code alongside the freely accessible MIMIC-III database, we enable end-to-end reproducible analysis of electronic health records.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCritical CareDatabases, FactualAccess to InformationComorbidityData MiningElectronic Health RecordsHumansOrgan Dysfunction ScoresReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexTherapeuticscritical caredata miningelectronic health recordintensive caremimic-iiireproducibility

Identifiers

PMID29036464
PMCPMC6381763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.