Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29036413›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2018

Smooth quantile normalization.

Stephanie C Hicks, Kwame Okrah, Joseph N Paulson, John Quackenbush, Rafael A Irizarry, Héctor Corrada Bravo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Algal origins of core land plant stress response subnetworks.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie C HicksDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Kwame OkrahGenetech, Product Development Biostatistics, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Joseph N PaulsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
John QuackenbushDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Rafael A IrizarryDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Héctor Corrada BravoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Institute of Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, 8314 Paint Branch Dr., College Park, MD 20742, College Park, USA.

Funding

VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI A. Heather Eliassen · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
Tissue and Pathology ResourcesP50CA127003 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI EL-BARDEESY, NABEEL, SELLERS, WILLIAM R · 2007 to 2023
$33.2M
Respiratory Computational Discovery CoreP01HL114501 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHOI, MARY E · 2013 to 2025
$24.9M
Systems Biology, Bioinformatics, and BiostatisticsP01HL105339 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SILVERMAN, EDWIN K · 2011 to 2015
$12.2M
Statistical Methods for Analysis of Massive Genetic and Genomic Data in Cancer ResearchR35CA197449 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI XIHONG LIN · 2015 to 2026
$10.9M
Chemical Inhibitors to Define an Essential M. Tuberculosis Signaling NetworkR01AI099204 · NIAID · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HUSSON, ROBERT N · 2012 to 2016
$6.1M
Preprocessing and Analysis Tools for High-Throughput TechnologiesR01GM083084 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IRIZARRY, RAFAEL ANGEL · 2007 to 2018
$4.4M
Using Networks to Assign Gene Function in Lung DiseaseR01HL111759 · NHLBI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, SILVERMAN, EDWIN K · 2012 to 2015
$3.4M
Genotype and Imaging Phenotype Biomarkers in Lung CancerU01CA190234 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI AERTS, HUGO, QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
MeV: Software for Next Generation Genomic Data AnalysisU01CA151118 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Integrative Visual and Computational Exploratory Analysis of Genomics DataR01GM114267 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CORRADA BRAVO, HECTOR · 2015 to 2018
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127003NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197449NCI NIH HHS U01 CA151118NCI NIH HHS U01 CA190234NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL105339NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL114501NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111759NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI099204NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083084NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between-sample normalization is a critical step in genomic data analysis to remove systematic bias and unwanted technical variation in high-throughput data. Global normalization methods are based on the assumption that observed variability in global properties is due to technical reasons and are unrelated to the biology of interest. For example, some methods correct for differences in sequencing read counts by scaling features to have similar median values across samples, but these fail to reduce other forms of unwanted technical variation. Methods such as quantile normalization transform the statistical distributions across samples to be the same and assume global differences in the distribution are induced by only technical variation. However, it remains unclear how to proceed with normalization if these assumptions are violated, for example, if there are global differences in the statistical distributions between biological conditions or groups, and external information, such as negative or control features, is not available. Here, we introduce a generalization of quantile normalization, referred to as smooth quantile normalization (qsmooth), which is based on the assumption that the statistical distribution of each sample should be the same (or have the same distributional shape) within biological groups or conditions, but allowing that they may differ between groups. We illustrate the advantages of our method on several high-throughput datasets with global differences in distributions corresponding to different biological conditions. We also perform a Monte Carlo simulation study to illustrate the bias-variance tradeoff and root mean squared error of qsmooth compared to other global normalization methods. A software implementation is available from https://github.com/stephaniehicks/qsmooth.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalModels, StatisticalBiostatisticsGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumans

Identifiers

PMID29036413
PMCPMC5862355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.