Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29036322›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

tGBS® genotyping-by-sequencing enables reliable genotyping of heterozygous loci.

Alina Ott, Sanzhen Liu, James C Schnable, Cheng-Ting 'Eddy' Yeh, Kai-Sin Wang, Patrick S Schnable

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. QTL analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic analysis of NE Atlantic sardine (Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Introduction to the Special Issue ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Novel Alleles fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alina OttDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3650, USA.
Sanzhen LiuDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3650, USA.
James C SchnableData2Bio LLC, Ames, IA 50011-3650, USA.
Cheng-Ting 'Eddy' YehDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3650, USA.
Kai-Sin WangData2Bio LLC, Ames, IA 50011-3650, USA.
Patrick S SchnableDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3650, USA.
Iowa State University · USKansas State University · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional genotyping-by-sequencing (cGBS) strategies suffer from high rates of missing data and genotyping errors, particularly at heterozygous sites. tGBS® genotyping-by-sequencing is a novel method of genome reduction that employs two restriction enzymes to generate overhangs in opposite orientations to which (single-strand) oligos rather than (double-stranded) adaptors are ligated. This strategy ensures that only double-digested fragments are amplified and sequenced. The use of oligos avoids the necessity of preparing adaptors and the problems associated with inter-adaptor annealing/ligation. Hence, the tGBS protocol simplifies the preparation of high-quality GBS sequencing libraries. During polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, selective nucleotides included at the 3'-end of the PCR primers result in additional genome reduction as compared to cGBS. By adjusting the number of selective bases, different numbers of genomic sites are targeted for sequencing. Therefore, for equivalent amounts of sequencing, more reads per site are available for SNP calling. Hence, as compared to cGBS, tGBS delivers higher SNP calling accuracy (>97-99%), even at heterozygous sites, less missing data per marker across a population of samples, and an enhanced ability to genotype rare alleles. tGBS is particularly well suited for genomic selection, which often requires the ability to genotype populations of individuals that are heterozygous at many loci.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideChromosome MappingGenetic LociGenomicsGenotyping TechniquesHeterozygoteSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID29036322
PMCPMC5716196
OpenAlexW2757580221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.