Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29035873›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2017

Multi-task transfer learning deep convolutional neural network: application to computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer on mammograms.

Ravi K Samala, Heang-Ping Chan, Lubomir M Hadjiiski, Mark A Helvie, Kenny H Cha, Caleb D Richter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Ipsilateral Lesion Detection Refinement for Tomosynthesis.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ravi K SamalaDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5842, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6661-4801
Heang-Ping ChanDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5842, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7777-9006
Lubomir M HadjiiskiDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5842, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2069-8066
Mark A HelvieDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5842, United States of America.
Kenny H ChaDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5842, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-7448
Caleb D RichterDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5842, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6491-2525

Funding

Improvement of microcalcification detection in digital breast tomosynthesisR01CA151443 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHAN, HEANG-PING · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transfer learning in deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) is an important step in its application to medical imaging tasks. We propose a multi-task transfer learning DCNN with the aim of translating the 'knowledge' learned from non-medical images to medical diagnostic tasks through supervised training and increasing the generalization capabilities of DCNNs by simultaneously learning auxiliary tasks. We studied this approach in an important application: classification of malignant and benign breast masses. With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, digitized screen-film mammograms (SFMs) and digital mammograms (DMs) were collected from our patient files and additional SFMs were obtained from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography. The data set consisted of 2242 views with 2454 masses (1057 malignant, 1397 benign). In single-task transfer learning, the DCNN was trained and tested on SFMs. In multi-task transfer learning, SFMs and DMs were used to train the DCNN, which was then tested on SFMs. N-fold cross-validation with the training set was used for training and parameter optimization. On the independent test set, the multi-task transfer learning DCNN was found to have significantly (p  =  0.007) higher performance compared to the single-task transfer learning DCNN. This study demonstrates that multi-task transfer learning may be an effective approach for training DCNN in medical imaging applications when training samples from a single modality are limited.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29035873
PMCPMC5859950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.