Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29035760›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2018

Engineering nanoreactors using bacterial microcompartment architectures.

Jefferson S Plegaria, Cheryl A Kerfeld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Engineering spatiotemporal organization and dynamics in synthetic cells.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  9. Advances in the World of Bacterial Microcompartments.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bacterial microcompartments.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jefferson S PlegariaMSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Cheryl A KerfeldMSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Berkeley Synthetic Biology Institute, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address: ckerfeld@lbl.gov.

Funding

Structure and Function of Bacterial Microcompartment Shells from Human PathogensR01AI114975 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI KERFELD, CHERYL A · 2015 to 2022
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial microcompartments (BMCs) are organelles that encapsulate enzymes involved in CO

Indexed as

BioengineeringMultigene FamilyBacteriaBacterial ProteinsCarbon DioxideEnzymesNanoparticlesBacterial ProteinsCarbon DioxideEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID29035760
PMCPMC5899066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.