Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29035510›Full record

ReviewACS chemical biology2018

CRISPRi and CRISPRa Screens in Mammalian Cells for Precision Biology and Medicine.

Martin Kampmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 233 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martin KampmannDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases and California Institute for Quantitative Biomedical Research, University of California , San Francisco, California 94158, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3819-7019

Funding

Project 3: Autophagy dysfunction and neuronal activity in FTDU54NS100717 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GAN, LI · 2016 to 2020
$10.8M
Rewiring of the human protein homeostasis network in normal and disease contextsDP2GM119139 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KAMPMANN, MARTIN · 2015 to 2015
$2.3M
Stress response networks in cancer: systematic mapping and therapeutic potentialR00CA181494 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KAMPMANN, MARTIN · 2015 to 2017
$747k
Stress response networks in cancer: systematic mapping and therapeutic potentialK99CA181494 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KAMPMANN, MARTIN · 2014 to 2014
$139k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA181494NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM119139NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS100717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation DNA sequencing technologies have led to a massive accumulation of genomic and transcriptomic data from patients and healthy individuals. The major challenge ahead is to understand the functional significance of the elements of the human genome and transcriptome, and implications for diagnosis and treatment. Genetic screens in mammalian cells are a powerful approach to systematically elucidating gene function in health and disease states. In particular, recently developed CRISPR/Cas9-based screening approaches have enormous potential to uncover mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for human diseases. The focus of this review is the use of CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) and CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) for genetic screens in mammalian cells. We introduce the underlying technology and present different types of CRISPRi/a screens, including those based on cell survival/proliferation, sensitivity to drugs or toxins, fluorescent reporters, and single-cell transcriptomes. Combinatorial screens, in which large numbers of gene pairs are targeted to construct genetic interaction maps, reveal pathway relationships and protein complexes. We compare and contrast CRISPRi and CRISPRa with alternative technologies, including RNA interference (RNAi) and CRISPR nuclease-based screens. Finally, we highlight challenges and opportunities ahead.

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEndonucleasesGain of Function MutationGene ExpressionGenetic TestingHumansRNA InterferenceCRISPR-Associated ProteinsEndonucleases

Identifiers

PMID29035510
PMCPMC5886776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.