Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29035429›Full record

ReviewKorean circulation journal2017

Where Is the "Optimal" Fontan Hemodynamics?

Hideo Ohuchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean circulation journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Robotic-assisted Lymphovenous Anastomosis of the Central Lymphatic System.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hideo OhuchiDepartments of Pediatric Cardiology and Adult Congenital Heart Disease, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan. hohuchi@hsp.ncvc.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fontan circulation is generally characterized by high central venous pressure, low cardiac output, and slightly low arterial oxygen saturation, and it is quite different from normal biventricular physiology. Therefore, when a patient with congenital heart disease is selected as a candidate for this type of circulation, the ultimate goals of therapy consist of 2 components. One is a smooth adjustment to the new circulation, and the other is long-term circulatory stabilization after adjustment. When either of these goals is not achieved, the patient is categorized as having "failed" Fontan circulation, and the prognosis is dismal. For the first goal of smooth adjustment, a lot of effort has been made to establish criteria for patient selection and intensive management immediately after the Fontan operation. For the second goal of long-term circulatory stabilization, there is limited evidence of successful strategies for long-term hemodynamic stabilization. Furthermore, there have been no data on optimal hemodynamics in Fontan circulation that could be used as a reference for patient management. Although small clinical trials and case reports are available, the results cannot be generalized to the majority of Fontan survivors. We recently reported the clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of early and late failing Fontan survivors and their association with all-cause mortality. This knowledge could provide insight into the complex Fontan pathophysiology and might help establish a management strategy for long-term hemodynamic stabilization.

Indexed as

Cardiac outputFontan procedureHemodynamicsMortalityVascular resistance

Identifiers

PMID29035429
PMCPMC5711675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.