Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29035385›Full record

ReviewNature structural & molecular biology2017

Class 2 CRISPR-Cas RNA-guided endonucleases: Swiss Army knives of genome editing.

Stefano Stella, Pablo Alcón, Guillermo Montoya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. RNAi and genome editing of sugarcane: Progress and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeted mutagenesis in mice via an engineered AsCas12f1 system.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Article
  9. Unveil the Secret of the Bacteria and Phage Arms Race.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics: progress and prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. CRISPR-Cas technology a new era in genomic engineering.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. An Outlook on Global Regulatory Landscape for Genome-Edited Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefano StellaProtein Structure & Function Programme, Structural Molecular Biology Group, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pablo AlcónProtein Structure & Function Programme, Structural Molecular Biology Group, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7435-3859
Guillermo MontoyaProtein Structure & Function Programme, Structural Molecular Biology Group, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8269-3941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas is a bacterial defense system against phage infection and nucleic acid invasion. Class 2 type II CRISPR-Cas9 has also been widely used for genome engineering. Here, we review novel insights into the CRISPR class 2 type V enzymes, specifically Cpf1 and C2c1, which display different DNA-recognition and cleavage characteristics than those of Cas9, the best-characterized member of class 2. Recent structures of these ribonucleoprotein complexes that capture several stages of the endonuclease reaction have provided molecular details of recognition, unzipping and cleavage of the target DNA, allowing their comparison with Cas9. A detailed understanding of these mechanisms is crucial for improving these genome engineering tools and expanding the genomic space that can be targeted.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsEndonucleasesGene EditingRecombinant ProteinsRNAEndonucleasesRecombinant ProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID29035385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.