Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29035268›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2016

Trace element and isotope deposition across the air-sea interface: progress and research needs.

A R Baker, W M Landing, E Bucciarelli, M Cheize, S Fietz, C T Hayes, D Kadko, P L Morton, N Rogan, G Sarthou and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. How well can we quantify dust deposition to the ocean?Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2016
    Article
  4. Hydrothermal impacts on trace element and isotope ocean biogeochemistry.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

A R BakerCentre for Ocean and Atmospheric Science, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK alex.baker@uea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8365-8953
W M LandingDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA wlanding@fsu.edu.
E BucciarelliLEMAR/IUEM, UMR 6539 CNRS-UBO-IRD-IFREMER, Place Nicolas Copernic, Technopôle Brest Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France.
M CheizeLEMAR/IUEM, UMR 6539 CNRS-UBO-IRD-IFREMER, Place Nicolas Copernic, Technopôle Brest Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France.
S FietzDepartment of Earth Sciences, Stellenbosch University, 7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa.
C T HayesDepartment of Marine Science, University of Southern Mississippi, Stennis Space Center, Kiln, MS 39529, USA.
D KadkoApplied Research Center, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler St., Engineering Center Suite 2100, Miami, FL 33174, USA.
P L MortonDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
N RoganGEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 1-3 Wischhofstrasse, Kiel 24148, Germany.
G SarthouLEMAR/IUEM, UMR 6539 CNRS-UBO-IRD-IFREMER, Place Nicolas Copernic, Technopôle Brest Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France.
R U ShelleyLEMAR/IUEM, UMR 6539 CNRS-UBO-IRD-IFREMER, Place Nicolas Copernic, Technopôle Brest Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France.
Z ShiSchool of Geography Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
A ShillerDepartment of Marine Science, University of Southern Mississippi, Stennis Space Center, Kiln, MS 39529, USA.
M M P van HultenLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), IPSL, CEA-Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of the atmospheric deposition of biologically essential trace elements, especially iron, is widely recognized, as are the difficulties of accurately quantifying the rates of trace element wet and dry deposition and their fractional solubility. This paper summarizes some of the recent progress in this field, particularly that driven by the GEOTRACES, and other, international research programmes. The utility and limitations of models used to estimate atmospheric deposition flux, for example, from the surface ocean distribution of tracers such as dissolved aluminium, are discussed and a relatively new technique for quantifying atmospheric deposition using the short-lived radionuclide beryllium-7 is highlighted. It is proposed that this field will advance more rapidly by using a multi-tracer approach, and that aerosol deposition models should be ground-truthed against observed aerosol concentration data. It is also important to improve our understanding of the mechanisms and rates that control the fractional solubility of these tracers. Aerosol provenance and chemistry (humidity, acidity and organic ligand characteristics) play important roles in governing tracer solubility. Many of these factors are likely to be influenced by changes in atmospheric composition in the future. Intercalibration exercises for aerosol chemistry and fractional solubility are an essential component of the GEOTRACES programme.This article is part of the themed issue 'Biological and climatic impacts of ocean trace element chemistry'.

Indexed as

air–sea exchangeanthropogenic aerosolsatmospheric depositionbiogeochemical impactsmineral dusttrace element solubility

Identifiers

PMID29035268
PMCPMC5069538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.