ArticleGlobal health action2017
Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa.
Article in Global health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategic health policy priorities for health technology assessment development in Iran.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2026Article
- Mapping the social networks of key actors in the development of health technology assessment in Iran.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Health technology assessment capacity to support Zambia's health benefits package reform policy.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Suitability of paediatric legislation beyond the USA and Europe: a qualitative study on access to paediatric medicines.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- A New eHealth Investment Appraisal Framework for Africa: Validation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Developing a tool to assess the skills to perform a health technology assessment.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Assessing the potential of HTA to inform resource allocation decisions in low-income settings: The case of Malawi.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Health technology assessment in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2021Article
- Costs of implementing community-based intervention for HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.Implementation science communications · 2021Review
- The role of government agencies and other actors in influencing access to medicines in three East African countries.Health policy and planning · 2021Article
- Growth and capacity for cost-effectiveness analysis in Africa.Health economics · 2020Article
- Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders' capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria.Globalization and health · 2020Article
- Review of Ongoing Activities and Challenges to Improve the Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Across Africa and the Implications for the Future.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-Saharan Africa: an initial survey of stakeholders.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Primary and secondary prevention interventions for cardiovascular disease in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of economic evaluations.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2018Review
- EHealth Investment Appraisal in Africa: A Scoping Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAchieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacity of individuals, institutions and networks to apply economic evaluation in support of health technology assessment and effective priority-setting.
objectiveOn the basis of international lessons, to identify how research organisations and partnerships could contribute to capacity strengthening for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa.
methodsA rapid scan was conducted of international formal and grey literature and lessons extracted from the deliberations of two international and regional workshops relating to capacity-building for health technology assessment. 'Capacity' was defined in broad terms, including a conducive political environment, strong public institutional capacity to drive priority-setting, effective networking between experts, strong research organisations and skilled researchers.
resultsEffective priority-setting requires more than high quality economic research. Researchers have to engage with an array of stakeholders, network closely other research organisations, build partnerships with different levels of government and train the future generation of researchers and policy-makers. In low- and middle-income countries where there are seldom government units or agencies dedicated to health technology assessment, they also have to support the development of an effective priority-setting process that is sensitive to societal and government needs and priorities.
conclusionsResearch organisations have an important role to play in contributing to the development of health technology assessment and priority-setting capacity. In Africa, where there are resource and capacity challenges, effective partnerships between local and international researchers, and with key government stakeholders, can leverage existing skills and knowledge to generate a critical mass of individuals and institutions. These would help to meet the priority-setting needs of African countries and contribute to sustainable universal health coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.