Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29034551›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2018

Early breastfeeding practices: Descriptive analysis of recent Demographic and Health Surveys.

Laura Oakley, Lenka Benova, David Macleod, Caroline A Lynch, Oona M R Campbell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura OakleyFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4697-4316
Lenka BenovaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8595-365X
David MacleodFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Caroline A LynchFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0072-0473
Oona M R CampbellFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-0115
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe early breastfeeding practices (initiation within 1 hr of birth, no prelacteal feeding, and a combination of both-"optimal" early breastfeeding) according to childbirth location in low- and middle-income countries. Using data from the most recent Demographic and Health Survey (2000-2013) for 57 countries, we extracted information on the most recent birth for women aged 15-49 with a live birth in the preceding 24 months. Childbirth setting was self-reported by location (home or facility) and subtype (home delivery with or without a skilled birth attendant; public or private facility). We produced overall world and four region-level summary statistics by applying national population adjusted survey weights. Overall, 39% of children were breastfed within 1 hr of birth (region range 31-60%), 49% received no prelacteal feeding (41-65%), and 28% benefited from optimal early breastfeeding (21-46%). In South/Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, early breastfeeding outcomes were more favourable for facility births compared to home births; trends were less consistent in Latin America and Middle East/Europe. Among home deliveries, there was a higher prevalence of positive breastfeeding practices for births with a skilled birth attendant across all regions other than Latin America. For facility births, breastfeeding practices were more favourable among those taking place in the public sector. This study is the most comprehensive assessment to date of early breastfeeding practices by childbirth location. Our results suggest that skilled delivery care-particularly care delivered in public sector facilities-appears positively correlated with favourable breastfeeding practices.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfricaAsiaBreast FeedingCaribbean RegionCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansJupiterLatin AmericaMiddle AgedYoung Adultbirthbreastfeedingbreastfeeding initiationinequalitieslow income countriesmaternal public health

Identifiers

PMID29034551
PMCPMC5900960
OpenAlexW2766218948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.