Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29034410›Full record

ArticleArchives of women's mental health2018

Caste matters: perceived discrimination among women in rural India.

Jasmine Khubchandani, Apurv Soni, Nisha Fahey, Nitin Raithatha, Anusha Prabhakaran, Nancy Byatt, Tiffany A Moore Simas, Ajay Phatak, Milagros Rosal, Somashekhar Nimbalkar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Late adolescents' accounts of marginalization in India: Towards a ground-up intersectional framework.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jasmine KhubchandaniUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Albert Sherman Center, 55 Lake Avenue N, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Apurv SoniUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Albert Sherman Center, 55 Lake Avenue N, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA. Apurv.Soni@umassmed.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5049-3657
Nisha FaheyUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Albert Sherman Center, 55 Lake Avenue N, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Nitin RaithathaPramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, India.
Anusha PrabhakaranPramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, India.
Nancy ByattUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Albert Sherman Center, 55 Lake Avenue N, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Tiffany A Moore SimasUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Albert Sherman Center, 55 Lake Avenue N, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Ajay PhatakPramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, India.
Milagros RosalUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Albert Sherman Center, 55 Lake Avenue N, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Somashekhar NimbalkarPramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, India.
Jeroan J AllisonUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Albert Sherman Center, 55 Lake Avenue N, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.

Funding

University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical Science and Translational SupplementUL1TR001453 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2015 to 2024
$39.0M
UMass Center for Health Equity Intervention ResearchP60MD006912 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEMON, STEPHENIE C. · 2012 to 2016
$6.8M
University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceTL1TR001454 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEWIS, BRIAN C · 2015 to 2024
$3.6M
University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2TR000160 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
Trends, Predictors, and Consequences of Child UndernutritionF30HD091975 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SONI, APURV · 2017 to 2020
$142k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000160NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000160NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001454NCATS NIH HHS TL1-TR001454NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001453NICHD NIH HHS F30 HD091975NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD006912NIMHD NIH HHS P60-MD006912-05University of Massachusetts Medical School 2013 Office of Global Health Pilot Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship of caste and class with perceived discrimination among pregnant women from rural western India. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 170 pregnant women in rural Gujarat, India, who were enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study. The Everyday Discrimination Scale and the Experiences of Discrimination questionnaires were used to assess perceived discrimination and response to discrimination. Based on self-report caste, women were classified into three categories with increasing historical disadvantage: General, Other Backward Castes (OBC), and Scheduled Caste or Tribes (SC/ST). Socioeconomic class was determined using the standardized Kuppuswamy scale. Regression models for count and binomial data were used to examine association of caste and class with experience of discrimination and response to discrimination. Sixty-eight percent of women experienced discrimination. After adjusting for confounders, there was a consistent trend and association of discrimination with caste but not class. In comparison to General Caste, lower caste (OBC, SC/ST) women were more likely to (1) experience discrimination (OBC OR: 2.2, SC/ST: 4.1; p trend: 0.01); (2) have a greater perceived discrimination score (OBC IRR: 1.3, SC/ST: 1.5; p trend: 0.07); (3) accept discrimination (OBC OR: 6.4, SC/ST: 7.6; p trend: < 0.01); and (4) keep to herself about discrimination (OBC OR: 2.7, SC/ST: 3.6; p trend: 0.04). The differential experience of discrimination by lower caste pregnant women in comparison to upper caste pregnant women and their response to such experiences highlight the importance of studying discrimination to understand the root causes of existing caste-based disparities.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPrejudiceRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCasteIndiaPerceived discriminationRuralSocial justiceSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID29034410
PMCPMC5857209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.