ArticleInnovation in aging2017
Reliability and Validity of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relationship Between Financial Decision-Making and Financial Exploitation in Older Black Adults.Journal of aging and health · 2022Article
- Online monitoring of financial capacity in older adults: Feasibility and initial findings.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Financial Stressors and Resources Associated With Financial Exploitation.Innovation in aging · 2022Article
- A generic brain connectome map linked to different types of everyday decision-making in old age.Brain structure & function · 2020Observational
- Elder Abuse Assessment Tools and Interventions for use in the Home Environment: a Scoping Review.Clinical interventions in aging · 2020Article
- Aging and Informed Financial Decision Making: New Tools for the Professional Working With Older Adults.CSA journal (Denver, Colo.) · 2018Article
- Which Items of the Financial Decision Tracker Differentiate Those with Decision-making Deficits from Those with No Deficits? Data from the Michigan APS Implementation Project.Clinical gerontologistArticle
- Conceptual and Empirical Approaches to Financial Decision-making by Older Adults: Results from a Financial Decision-making Rating Scale.Clinical gerontologistArticle
- Cross-Validation of the Financial Exploitation Vulnerability Scale.Clinical gerontologistArticle
- Quantifying Risk of Financial Incapacity and Financial Exploitation in Community-dwelling Older Adults: Utility of a Scoring System for the Lichtenberg Financial Decision-making Rating Scale.Clinical gerontologistArticle
- A Short Form of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale.Clinical gerontologistArticle
- Methodological approaches to the analyses of elder abuse screening measures: Application of latent variable measurement modeling to the WC-RAPS.Journal of elder abuse & neglectArticle
- Cross-validation of the screening scale in an adult protective services sample.Journal of elder abuse & neglectArticle
- Implementation of financial decision making scales into statewide APS practice: the Michigan experience.Journal of elder abuse & neglectArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The scarcity of empirically validated assessment instruments continues to impede the work of professionals in a number of fields, including medicine, finance, and estate planning; adult protective services; and criminal justice-and, more importantly, it impedes their ability to effectively assist and, in some case, protect their clients. Other professionals (e.g. legal, financial, medical, mental health services) are in a position to prevent financial exploitation and would benefit from access to new instruments. The Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale (LFDSS) was introduced in 2016, along with evidence for its convergent validity (Lichtenberg et al., 2016). Using a sample of 213 participants, this study investigated the internal consistency of the LFDSS and its criterion validity based on ratings by professionals using the scale. Results demonstrate that the LFDSS has excellent internal consistency and clinical utility properties. This paper provides support for use of the LFDSS as a reliable and valid instrument. The LFDSS and instructions for its use are included in the article, along with information about online tools and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.