ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017
Unveiling Chloroplast RNA Editing Events Using Next Generation Small RNA Sequencing Data.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maturase K forms a plastidial splicing complex with a neofunctionalized branching enzyme.Nature communications · 2026Article
- RNA-binding proteins orchestrating immunity in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- RNA editing-induced structural and functional adaptations of NAD9 inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Deciphering the enigma of RNA editing in the ATP1_alpha subunit of ATP synthase inSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023Article
- Chloroplast Genome of Lithocarpus dealbatus (Hook.f. & Thomson ex Miq.) Rehder Establishes Monophyletic Origin of the Species and Reveals Mutational Hotspots with Taxon Delimitation PotentialLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparative Chloroplast Genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- The first report of RNA U to C or G editing in the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 (Nad5) transcript of wild barley.Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- The Algal Chloroplast as a Testbed for Synthetic Biology Designs Aimed at Radically Rewiring Plant Metabolism.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Light/heat effects on RNA editing in chloroplast NADH-plastoquinone oxidoreductase subunit 2 (ndhB) gene of Calotropis (Calotropis procera).Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2020Article
- Salinity effects on nad3 gene RNA editing of wild barley mitochondria.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Plastid genomics ofPeerJ · 2020Article
- Identification of soybean trans-factors associated with plastid RNA editing sites.Genetics and molecular biology · 2020Article
- Comparison of different annotation tools for characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Corylus avellana cv Tombul.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Potential of Transcript Editing Across Mitogenomes of Early Land Plants Shows Novel and Familiar Trends.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Expected and unexpected evolution of plant RNA editing factors CLB19, CRR28 and RARE1: retention of CLB19 despite a phylogenetically deep loss of its two known editing targets in Poaceae.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organellar RNA editing involves the modification of nucleotide sequences to maintain conserved protein functions, mainly by reverting non-neutral codon mutations. The loss of plastid editing events, resulting from mutations in RNA editing factors or through stress interference, leads to developmental, physiological and photosynthetic alterations. Recently, next generation sequencing technology has generated the massive discovery of sRNA sequences and expanded the number of sRNA data. Here, we present a method to screen chloroplast RNA editing using public sRNA libraries from Arabidopsis, soybean and rice. We mapped the sRNAs against the nuclear, mitochondrial and plastid genomes to confirm predicted cytosine to uracil (C-to-U) editing events and identify new editing sites in plastids. Among the predicted editing sites, 40.57, 34.78, and 25.31% were confirmed using sRNAs from Arabidopsis, soybean and rice, respectively. SNP analysis revealed 58.2, 43.9, and 37.5% new C-to-U changes in the respective species and identified known and new putative adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing in tRNAs. The present method and data reveal the potential of sRNA as a reliable source to identify new and confirm known editing sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.