Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29033950›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2017

Glutathione Fine-Tunes the Innate Immune Response toward Antiviral Pathways in a Macrophage Cell Line Independently of Its Antioxidant Properties.

Marina Diotallevi, Paola Checconi, Anna Teresa Palamara, Ignacio Celestino, Lucia Coppo, Arne Holmgren, Kahina Abbas, Fabienne Peyrot, Manuela Mengozzi, Pietro Ghezzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Triple Crown: NO, CO, and HPharmacology & therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  13. Polymorphisms of theLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Utility of NO and HNitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Marina DiotalleviBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Paola ChecconiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Laboratory Affiliated to Istituto Pasteur Italia-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Rome, Italy.
Anna Teresa PalamaraDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Laboratory Affiliated to Istituto Pasteur Italia-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Rome, Italy.
Ignacio CelestinoIRCCS, San Raffaele Pisana, Telematic University, Rome, Italy.
Lucia CoppoDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Arne HolmgrenDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kahina AbbasLCBPT, UMR 8601 CNRS-Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Fabienne PeyrotLCBPT, UMR 8601 CNRS-Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Manuela MengozziBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Pietro GhezziBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Pasteur · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITSorbonne Paris Cité · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutathione (GSH), a major cellular antioxidant, is considered an inhibitor of the inflammatory response involving reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, evidence is largely based on experiments with exogenously added antioxidants/reducing agents or pro-oxidants. We show that depleting macrophages of 99% of GSH does not exacerbate the inflammatory gene expression profile in the RAW264 macrophage cell line or increase expression of inflammatory cytokines in response to the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS); only two small patterns of LPS-induced genes were sensitive to GSH depletion. One group, mapping to innate immunity and antiviral responses (Oas2, Oas3, Mx2, Irf7, Irf9, STAT1, il1b), required GSH for optimal induction. Consequently, GSH depletion prevented the LPS-induced activation of antiviral response and its inhibition of influenza virus infection. LPS induction of a second group of genes (Prdx1, Srxn1, Hmox1, GSH synthase, cysteine transporters), mapping to nrf2 and the oxidative stress response, was increased by GSH depletion. We conclude that the main function of endogenous GSH is not to limit inflammation but to fine-tune the innate immune response to infection.

Indexed as

antiviral immunityglutathioneinflammationinfluenzainnate immunitymacrophagesredox regulationTLR4

Identifiers

PMID29033950
PMCPMC5626850
OpenAlexW2758531373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.