Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29033919›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Adaptation of Methanogenic Inocula to Anaerobic Digestion of Maize Silage.

Martyna Wojcieszak, Adam Pyzik, Krzysztof Poszytek, Pawel S Krawczyk, Adam Sobczak, Leszek Lipinski, Otton Roubinek, Jacek Palige, Aleksandra Sklodowska, Lukasz Drewniak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Deciphering the effects of temperature on bio-methane generation through anaerobic digestion.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessment of the start-up process of anaerobic digestion utilizing swine manure:Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Martyna WojcieszakLaboratory of Environmental Pollution Analysis, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Adam PyzikInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof PoszytekLaboratory of Environmental Pollution Analysis, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Pawel S KrawczykInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Adam SobczakInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Leszek LipinskiInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Otton RoubinekInstitute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Jacek PaligeInstitute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra SklodowskaLaboratory of Environmental Pollution Analysis, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Lukasz DrewniakLaboratory of Environmental Pollution Analysis, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A well-balanced microbial consortium is crucial for efficient biogas production. In turn, one of a major factor that influence on the structure of anaerobic digestion (AD) consortium is a source of microorganisms which are used as an inoculum. This study evaluated the influence of inoculum sources (with various origin) on adaptation of a biogas community and the efficiency of the biomethanization of maize silage. As initial inocula for AD of maize silage the samples from: (i) an agricultural biogas plant (ABP) which utilizes maize silage as a main substrate, (ii) cattle slurry (CS), which contain elevated levels of lignocelluloses materials, and (iii) raw sewage sludge (RSS) with low content of plant origin materials were used. The adaptation of methanogenic consortia was monitored during a series of passages, and the functionality of the adapted consortia was verified through start-up operation of AD in two-stage reactors. During the first stages of the adaptation phase, methanogenic consortia occurred very slowly, and only after several passages did the microbial community adapts to allow production of biogas with high methane content. The ABP consortium revealed highest biogas production in the adaptation and in the start-up process. The biodiversity dynamics monitored during adaptation and start-up process showed that community profile changed in a similar direction in three studied consortia. Native communities were very distinct to each other, while at the end of the Phase II of the start-up process microbial diversity profile was similar in all consortia. All adopted bacterial communities were dominated by representatives of

Indexed as

anaerobic digestionbiodiversity dynamicsinoculum sourcemaize silagemethanogenic consortia

Identifiers

PMID29033919
PMCPMC5625012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.