Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29033838›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2017

The Target Residence Time of Antihistamines Determines Their Antagonism of the G Protein-Coupled Histamine H1 Receptor.

Reggie Bosma, Gesa Witt, Lea A I Vaas, Ivana Josimovic, Philip Gribbon, Henry F Vischer, Sheraz Gul, Rob Leurs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. BRET-Based Biosensors to Measure Agonist Efficacies in Histamine HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Efficacy and Safety of Non-brain Penetrating HCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Route to Prolonged Residence Time at the Histamine HJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reggie BosmaAmsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Science, VU University AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands.
Gesa WittFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology Screening PortHamburg, Germany.
Lea A I VaasFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology Screening PortHamburg, Germany.
Ivana JosimovicAmsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Science, VU University AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands.
Philip GribbonFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology Screening PortHamburg, Germany.
Henry F VischerAmsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Science, VU University AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands.
Sheraz GulFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology Screening PortHamburg, Germany.
Rob LeursAmsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Science, VU University AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands.
Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacodynamics of drug-candidates is often optimized by metrics that describe target binding (K

Indexed as

calcium mobilizationDMRGPCRhistamine H1 receptorinsurmountable antagonismligand binding kineticsrecovery timeresidence time

Identifiers

PMID29033838
PMCPMC5627017
OpenAlexW2756965977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.