ArticleWorld journal of nuclear medicine
Quantitative Metabolic Volumetric Product on
Article in World journal of nuclear medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Conventional Imaging: Nuclear Imaging in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Current Applications for Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Pulmonary Disease.Current pulmonology reports · 2020Review
- Can Metabolic Pathways Be Therapeutic Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis?Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Semi-quantitative analysis ofWorld journal of nuclear medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the role of fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the evaluation of treatment response evaluation to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in patients of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A total of ten patients with proven diagnosis of RA as per the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent clinical and biochemical evaluation and a baseline FDG-PET/CT with assessment of maximum standardized uptake value and metabolic volumetric product (MVP) values. DMARD therapy was started with a combination of hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine. On follow-up at 3 and 6 months, the response to treatment was assessed by clinical, biochemical, and FDG-PET/CT parameters. These parameters were analyzed in a combined manner, and the patients were grouped into 4 categories as per response to DMARD therapy - complete response, good response, mixed response, and no response. Evaluation of treatment response in ten patients at 3
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.