Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29033222›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2018

Processing of structural neuroimaging data in young children: Bridging the gap between current practice and state-of-the-art methods.

Thanh Vân Phan, Dirk Smeets, Joel B Talcott, Maaike Vandermosten

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. EEG functional connectivity analysis in the source space.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thanh Vân PhanExperimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; icometrix, Research and Development, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: thanhvan.phan@student.kuleuven.be.
Dirk Smeetsicometrix, Research and Development, Leuven, Belgium.
Joel B TalcottAston Brain Centre, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Maaike VandermostenExperimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure of the brain is subject to very rapid developmental changes during early childhood. Pediatric studies based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) over this age range have recently become more frequent, with the advantage of providing in vivo and non-invasive high-resolution images of the developing brain, toward understanding typical and atypical trajectories. However, it has also been demonstrated that application of currently standard MRI processing methods that have been developed with datasets from adults may not be appropriate for use with pediatric datasets. In this review, we examine the approaches currently used in MRI studies involving young children, including an overview of the rationale for new MRI processing methods that have been designed specifically for pediatric investigations. These methods are mainly related to the use of age-specific or 4D brain atlases, improved methods for quantifying and optimizing image quality, and provision for registration of developmental data obtained with longitudinal designs. The overall goal is to raise awareness of the existence of these methods and the possibilities for implementing them in developmental neuroimaging studies.

Indexed as

BrainChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingBrain atlasChildrenLongitudinal analysisNeural developmentNeuroimaging methodsStructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID29033222
PMCPMC6969273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.