Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29032790›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Formative qualitative research to develop community-based interventions addressing low birth weight in the plains of Nepal.

Joanna Morrison, Sophiya Dulal, Helen Harris-Fry, Machhindra Basnet, Neha Sharma, Bhim Shrestha, Dharma Manandhar, Anthony Costello, David Osrin, Naomi Saville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Differences in maternal and early child nutritional status by offspring sex in lowland Nepal.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joanna Morrison1Institute for Global Health,University College London,30 Guilford Street,London WC1N 1EH,UK.
Sophiya Dulal2Mother Infant Research Activities (MIRA),Thapathali,Kathmandu,Nepal.
Helen Harris-Fry1Institute for Global Health,University College London,30 Guilford Street,London WC1N 1EH,UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2367-908X
Machhindra Basnet2Mother Infant Research Activities (MIRA),Thapathali,Kathmandu,Nepal.
Neha Sharma2Mother Infant Research Activities (MIRA),Thapathali,Kathmandu,Nepal.
Bhim Shrestha2Mother Infant Research Activities (MIRA),Thapathali,Kathmandu,Nepal.
Dharma Manandhar2Mother Infant Research Activities (MIRA),Thapathali,Kathmandu,Nepal.
Anthony Costello1Institute for Global Health,University College London,30 Guilford Street,London WC1N 1EH,UK.
David Osrin1Institute for Global Health,University College London,30 Guilford Street,London WC1N 1EH,UK.
Naomi Saville1Institute for Global Health,University College London,30 Guilford Street,London WC1N 1EH,UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the factors affecting intra-household food allocation practices to inform the development of interventions to prevent low birth weight in rural plains of Nepal.

designQualitative methodology using purposive sampling to explore the barriers and facilitating factors to improved maternal nutrition.

settingRural Dhanusha District, Nepal. SUBJECTS: We purposively sampled twenty-five young daughters-in-law from marginalised groups living in extended families and conducted semi-structured interviews with them. We also conducted one focus group discussion with men and one with female community health volunteers who were mothers-in-law.

resultsGender and age hierarchies were important in household decision making. The mother-in-law was responsible for ensuring that a meal was provided to productive household members. The youngest daughter-in-law usually cooked last and ate less than other family members, and showed respect for other family members by cooking only when permitted and deferring to others' choice of food. There were limited opportunities for these women to snack between main meals. Daughters-in-law' movement outside the household was restricted and therefore family members perceived that their nutritional need was less. Poverty affected food choice and families considered cost before nutritional value.

conclusionsIt is important to work with the whole household, particularly mothers-in-law, to improve maternal nutrition. We present five barriers to behaviour change: poverty; lack of knowledge about cheap nutritional food, the value of snacking, and cheap nutritional food that does not require cooking; sharing food; lack of self-confidence; and deference to household guardians. We discuss how we have targeted our interventions to develop knowledge, discuss strategies to overcome barriers, engage mothers-in-law, and build the confidence and social support networks of pregnant women.

Indexed as

DietChoice BehaviorDecision MakingEatingFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFocus GroupsFood PreferencesHealth BehaviorHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightMaleMealsNepalPovertyQualitative ResearchGenderIntra-household food allocationNeonatal healthNutritionQualitative

Identifiers

PMID29032790
PMCPMC5756621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.