Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29032707›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2018

Safety of Psychiatric Inpatients at the Veterans Health Administration.

Steven C Marcus, Richard C Hermann, Martin R Frankel, Sara W Cullen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patients Who Die by Suicide: A Study of Treatment Patterns and Patient Safety Incidents in Norway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient Safety and Mental Health-A Growing Quality Gap in Canada.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient safety in marginalised groups: a narrative scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steven C Marcus
Richard C Hermann
Martin R Frankel
Sara W Cullen

Funding

Patient Safety in Inpatient PsychiatryR01MH086722 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MARCUS, STEVEN C · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
Inpatient Psychiatric Safety at the VAI01HX000702 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI MARCUS, STEVEN C · 2013 to 2013
–
HSRD VA I01 HX000702NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough reducing adverse events and medical errors has become a central focus of the U.S. health care system over the past two decades both within and outside the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospital systems, patients treated in psychiatric units of acute care general hospitals have been excluded from major research in this field.

methodsThe study included a random sample of 40 psychiatric units from medical centers in the national VHA system. Standardized abstraction tools were used to assess the electronic health records from 8,005 hospitalizations. Medical record administrators screened the records for the presence of ten specific types of patient safety events, which, when present, were evaluated by physician reviewers to assess whether the event was the result of an error, whether it caused harm, and whether it was preventable.

resultsApproximately one in five patients experienced a patient safety event. The most frequently occurring events were medication errors (which include delayed and missed doses) (17.2%), followed by adverse drug events (4.1%), falls (2.8%), and assault (1.0%). Most patient safety events (94.9%) resulted in little harm or no harm, and more than half (56.6%) of the events were deemed preventable.

conclusionsAlthough patient safety events in VHA psychiatric inpatient units were relatively common, a great majority of these events resulted in little or no patient harm. Nevertheless, many were preventable, and the study provides data with which to target future initiatives that may improve the safety of this vulnerable patient population.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHospitals, VeteransHumansInpatientsMedication ErrorsPatient SafetyUnited StatesVeteransAdverse eventsGeneral hospital psychiatryInpatient psychiatryMedical errorsPatient safetyVeterans issues

Identifiers

PMID29032707
PMCPMC5796527
OpenAlexW2767203128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.