Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29032499›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2017

DNA barcoding for molecular identification of Demodex based on mitochondrial genes.

Li Hu, YuanJun Yang, YaE Zhao, DongLing Niu, Rui Yang, RuiLing Wang, Zhaohui Lu, XiaoQi Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li HuDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
YuanJun YangDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
YaE ZhaoDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, China. zhaoyae@xjtu.edu.cn.
DongLing NiuDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Rui YangDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
RuiLing WangDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Zhaohui LuDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
XiaoQi LiDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81271856National Natural Science Foundation of China 81471972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been no widely accepted DNA barcode for species identification of Demodex. In this study, we attempted to solve this issue. First, mitochondrial cox1-5' and 12S gene fragments of Demodex folloculorum, D. brevis, D. canis, and D. caprae were amplified, cloned, and sequenced for the first time; intra/interspecific divergences were computed and phylogenetic trees were reconstructed. Then, divergence frequency distribution plots of those two gene fragments were drawn together with mtDNA cox1-middle region and 16S obtained in previous studies. Finally, their identification efficiency was evaluated by comparing barcoding gap. Results indicated that 12S had the higher identification efficiency. Specifically, for cox1-5' region of the four Demodex species, intraspecific divergences were less than 2.0%, and interspecific divergences were 21.1-31.0%; for 12S, intraspecific divergences were less than 1.4%, and interspecific divergences were 20.8-26.9%. The phylogenetic trees demonstrated that the four Demodex species clustered separately, and divergence frequency distribution plot showed that the largest intraspecific divergence of 12S (1.4%) was less than cox1-5' region (2.0%), cox1-middle region (3.1%), and 16S (2.8%). The barcoding gap of 12S was 19.4%, larger than cox1-5' region (19.1%), cox1-middle region (11.3%), and 16S (13.0%); the interspecific divergence span of 12S was 6.2%, smaller than cox1-5' region (10.0%), cox1-middle region (14.1%), and 16S (11.4%). Moreover, 12S has a moderate length (517 bp) for sequencing at once. Therefore, we proposed mtDNA 12S was more suitable than cox1 and 16S to be a DNA barcode for classification and identification of Demodex at lower category level.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicGenes, MitochondrialAnimalsBase SequenceDNA, MitochondrialDog DiseasesDogsMite InfestationsMitesMitochondriaPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNA, MitochondrialDemodexDNA barcodeMitochondrial genesSequence divergence

Identifiers

PMID29032499
OpenAlexW2763116508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.