Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29032497›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2017

Emerging mosquito species in Germany-a synopsis after 6 years of mosquito monitoring (2011-2016).

Helge Kampen, Astrid Schuhbauer, Doreen Walther

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Potential Global Distribution of the Invasive MosquitoTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The new invasive mosquito speciesFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helge KampenFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. helge.kampen@fli.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2754-3171
Astrid SchuhbauerBiogents AG, Regensburg, Germany.
Doreen WaltherLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Muencheberg, Germany.

Funding

German Federal Office for Agriculture and Food 2810HS022German Federal Office for Agriculture and Food 2819104115German Federal Office for Agriculture and Food 2819104615Robert-Koch-Institute 1362/1-982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globalisation and climate change are the main drivers of invasion of non-endemic regions by mosquitoes. Mass transportation of people, animals and goods facilitate accidental long-distance displacement while climate warming supports active spread and establishment of thermophilic species. In the framework of a mosquito-monitoring programme, eight non-indigenous culicid species have been registered in Germany since 2011, with four of them being more or less efficient vectors of disease agents and another four now considered established. The eight newly emerged species include Aedes albopictus, Ae. japonicus, Ae. aegypti, Ae. koreicus, Ae. berlandi, Ae. pulcritarsis, Anopheles petragnani and Culiseta longiareolata. We here review recent findings and at the same time present new findings of specimens of non-native mosquito species in Germany.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsClimate ChangeEcosystemFemaleGermanyMaleClimate changeGermanyGlobalisationInvasive species‘Mueckenatlas’Vector

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.