Trial reportClinical oral investigations2018
Interaction between chlorhexidine and fluoride in a mouthrinse solution-a 4-day and 6-week randomized clinical pilot study.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Toothpastes with Enzymes Support Gum Health and Reduce Plaque Formation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Anti-biofilm Activity of Oral Health-care Products Containing Chlorhexidine Digluconate and Citrox.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2020Article
- Physiochemical Analysis of Fluoride Availability and pH in Moroccan Mouthwashes: Clinical Implications for Enamel Safety.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the present investigation was to study if there is a reduced clinical effect and fluoride retention of a mouthrinse solution containing both chlorhexidine (CHX) and sodium fluoride (NaF). MATERIAL AND
methodsTwo clinical trials were designed as double-blind, randomized, cross-over studies. In study I, 16 healthy subjects were asked to rinse twice daily for 1 min during 4 days of no tooth brushing with four solutions: (1) 0.12% CHX + 0.2% NaF, (2) 0.2% NaF, (3) 0.12% CHX, and (4) placebo. In study II, another 16 healthy subjects rinsed with the same four solutions twice daily after tooth brushing during a 6-week period. Plaque formation, gingivitis, and microbiological samples from plaque and saliva, as well as fluoride retention, were analyzed.
resultsBoth studies showed that both CHX + NaF and CHX mouthrinses had the same clinical effect with regards to plaque formation and microflora in plaque and saliva. Similarly, fluoride retention was not altered by the CHX + NaF mouthrinse compared to the NaF solution.
conclusionThe combination of CHX and NaF in a mouthrinse showed the same clinical effect as the CHX solution. The retention of fluoride in the oral cavity was not affected by the combination of NaF and CHX. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A mouthrinse solution containing a mixture of CHX and NaF may be an interesting product for risk patients for caries and periodontal disease. However, this should be verified in further long-term clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.