Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29032046›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2018

Past, present, and future of genetic research in borderline personality disorder.

Anahita Bassir Nia, Matthew C Eveleth, Jonathan M Gabbay, Yonis J Hassan, Bosi Zhang, M Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anahita Bassir NiaDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Matthew C EvelethDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Jonathan M GabbayDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Yonis J HassanDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Bosi ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
M Mercedes Perez-RodriguezDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; The Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10468, USA; CIBERSAM, Autonoma University, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz and Ramon y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: mercedes.perez@mssm.edu.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ES

Funding

MSHS Translational Science HubKL2TR001435 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MOSKOWITZ, ALAN J · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a major mental illness with a lifetime prevalence of approximately 1-3%, characterized by a persistent pattern of instability in relationships, mood, impulse regulation, and sense of self. This results in impulsive self-damaging behavior, high suicide rates, and severe functional impairment. BPD has a complex, multifactorial etiology, resulting from an interaction among genetic and environmental substrates, and has moderate to high heritability based on twin and family studies. However, our understanding of the genetic architecture of BPD is very limited. This is a critical obstacle since genetics can pave the way for identifying new treatment targets and developing preventive and disease-modifying pharmacological treatments which are currently lacking. We review genetic studies in BPD, with a focus on limitations and challenges and future directions. Genetic research in BPD is still in its very early stages compared to other major psychiatric disorders. Most early genetic studies in BPD were non-replicated association studies in small samples, focused on single candidate genes. More recently, there has been one genome-wide linkage study and a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of subclinical BPD traits and a first GWAS in a relatively modest sample of patients fulfilling full diagnostic criteria for the disorder. Although there are adequate animal models for some of the core dimensions of BPD, there is a lack of translational research including data from animal models in BPD. Research in more pioneering fields, such as imaging genetics, deep sequencing and epigenetics, holds promise for elucidating the pathophysiology of BPD and identifying new treatment targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsBorderline Personality DisorderDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersEpigenomicsGene-Environment InteractionGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansModels, AnimalPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID29032046
PMCPMC5847441
OpenAlexW2755602381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.