Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29031049›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2018

Heart valve scaffold fabrication: Bioinspired control of macro-scale morphology, mechanics and micro-structure.

Antonio D'Amore, Samuel K Luketich, Giuseppe M Raffa, Salim Olia, Giorgio Menallo, Antonino Mazzola, Flavio D'Accardi, Tamir Grunberg, Xinzhu Gu, Michele Pilato and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A Tissue Engineering's Guide to Biomimicry.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of hypoxia inducible factor HIF-1Global cardiology science & practice · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Antonio D'AmoreDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Fondazione RiMED, Italy; Dipartimento innovazione industriale e digitale (DIIT), Università di Palermo, Italy.
Samuel K LuketichMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Giuseppe M RaffaIstituto mediterraneo trapianti e terapie ad alta specializzazione (ISMETT), UPMC, Italy.
Salim OliaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Artificial Heart Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Giorgio MenalloDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Antonino MazzolaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Dipartimento innovazione industriale e digitale (DIIT), Università di Palermo, Italy.
Flavio D'AccardiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Dipartimento innovazione industriale e digitale (DIIT), Università di Palermo, Italy.
Tamir GrunbergDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; ORT Braude College of Engineering, Israel.
Xinzhu GuDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michele PilatoIstituto mediterraneo trapianti e terapie ad alta specializzazione (ISMETT), UPMC, Italy.
Marina V KamenevaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Vinay BadhwarMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Dep. of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
William R WagnerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: wagnerwr@upmc.edu.
McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USIstituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione · ITORT Braude College · ILRi.MED · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

Cardiovascular Bioengineering Training ProgramT32HL076124 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SANJEEV G SHROFF · 2005 to 2026
$7.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Valvular heart disease is currently treated with mechanical valves, which benefit from longevity, but are burdened by chronic anticoagulation therapy, or with bioprosthetic valves, which have reduced thromboembolic risk, but limited durability. Tissue engineered heart valves have been proposed to resolve these issues by implanting a scaffold that is replaced by endogenous growth, leaving autologous, functional leaflets that would putatively eliminate the need for anticoagulation and avoid calcification. Despite the diversity in fabrication strategies and encouraging results in large animal models, control over engineered valve structure-function remains at best partial. This study aimed to overcome these limitations by introducing double component deposition (DCD), an electrodeposition technique that employs multi-phase electrodes to dictate valve macro and microstructure and resultant function. Results in this report demonstrate the capacity of the DCD method to simultaneously control scaffold macro-scale morphology, mechanics and microstructure while producing fully assembled stent-less multi-leaflet valves composed of microscopic fibers. DCD engineered valve characterization included: leaflet thickness, biaxial properties, bending properties, and quantitative structural analysis of multi-photon and scanning electron micrographs. Quasi-static ex-vivo valve coaptation testing and dynamic organ level functional assessment in a pressure pulse duplicating device demonstrated appropriate acute valve functionality.

Indexed as

AlloysAluminumAnimalsAortic ValveBiocompatible MaterialsElectroplatingHeart Valve DiseasesHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansMitral ValveModels, AnimalRegenerative MedicineStyreneSwineTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAlloysAluminumBiocompatible MaterialsStyreneAorticBending mechanicsBiaxial mechanicsElectrodepositionElectrospinningMitralPulmonary heart valve structureTissue engineered heart valveTricuspid

Identifiers

PMID29031049
PMCPMC5988585
OpenAlexW2762789623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.