Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29030906›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging and radiation oncology2018

Effects of interruptions of external beam radiation therapy on outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.

Yanqun Dong, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Tianyu Li, Thomas M Churilla, Rosalia Viterbo, Mark L Sobczak, Marc C Smaldone, David Yt Chen, Robert G Uzzo, Mark A Hallman and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanqun DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nicholas G ZaorskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-1986
Tianyu LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Thomas M ChurillaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rosalia ViterboDepartment of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mark L SobczakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Marc C SmaldoneDepartment of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David Yt ChenDepartment of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert G UzzoDepartment of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mark A HallmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eric M HorwitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate if interruptions of external beam radiation therapy impact outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer (PCa).

methodsWe included men with localized PCa treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of escalated dose (≥74 Gy in 1.8 or 2 Gy fractions) between 1992 and 2013 at an NCI-designated cancer centre. Men receiving androgen deprivation therapy were excluded. The non-treatment day ratio (NTDR) was defined as the number of non-treatment days divided by the total elapsed days of therapy. NTDR was analysed for each National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group.

resultsThere were 1728 men included (839 low-risk, 776 intermediate-risk and 113 high-risk), with a median follow up of 53.5 months (range 12-185.8). The median NTDR was 31% (range 23-71%), translating to approximately 2 breaks (each break represents a missed treatment that will be made up) for 8 weeks of RT with 5 treatments per week. The 75 percentile of NTDR was 33%, translating to approximately 4 breaks, which was used as the cutoff for analysis. There were no significant differences in freedom from biochemical failure, freedom from distant metastasis, cancer specific survival, or overall survival for men with NTDR ≥33% compared to NTDR<33% for each risk group. Multivariable analyses including NTDR, age, race, Gleason score, T stage, and PSA were performed using the proportional hazards regression procedure. NTDR≥33% was not significantly associated with increased hazard ratio for outcomes in each risk group compared to NTDR<33%.

conclusionUnintentional treatment breaks during dose escalated external beam radiation therapy for PCa did not cause a significant difference in outcomes, although duration of follow up limits the strength of this conclusion.

Indexed as

AgedHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRisk FactorsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeProstate-Specific Antigenoutcomesprostate cancerqualityradiation therapytreatment interruption

Identifiers

PMID29030906
PMCPMC5800942
OpenAlexW2762121162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.