Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29030804›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2017

A Multi-stage Representation of Cell Proliferation as a Markov Process.

Christian A Yates, Matthew J Ford, Richard L Mort

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian A YatesDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Centre for Mathematical Biology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. c.yates@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-7297
Matthew J FordMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC IGMM, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Richard L MortDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Furness Building, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.

Funding

London Mathematical Society 41461Medical Research Scotland (GB) #436FRGNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research #NC/M001091/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (GB) #NC/K001612/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stochastic simulation algorithm commonly known as Gillespie's algorithm (originally derived for modelling well-mixed systems of chemical reactions) is now used ubiquitously in the modelling of biological processes in which stochastic effects play an important role. In well-mixed scenarios at the sub-cellular level it is often reasonable to assume that times between successive reaction/interaction events are exponentially distributed and can be appropriately modelled as a Markov process and hence simulated by the Gillespie algorithm. However, Gillespie's algorithm is routinely applied to model biological systems for which it was never intended. In particular, processes in which cell proliferation is important (e.g. embryonic development, cancer formation) should not be simulated naively using the Gillespie algorithm since the history-dependent nature of the cell cycle breaks the Markov process. The variance in experimentally measured cell cycle times is far less than in an exponential cell cycle time distribution with the same mean.Here we suggest a method of modelling the cell cycle that restores the memoryless property to the system and is therefore consistent with simulation via the Gillespie algorithm. By breaking the cell cycle into a number of independent exponentially distributed stages, we can restore the Markov property at the same time as more accurately approximating the appropriate cell cycle time distributions. The consequences of our revised mathematical model are explored analytically as far as possible. We demonstrate the importance of employing the correct cell cycle time distribution by recapitulating the results from two models incorporating cellular proliferation (one spatial and one non-spatial) and demonstrating that changing the cell cycle time distribution makes quantitative and qualitative differences to the outcome of the models. Our adaptation will allow modellers and experimentalists alike to appropriately represent cellular proliferation-vital to the accurate modelling of many biological processes-whilst still being able to take advantage of the power and efficiency of the popular Gillespie algorithm.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsCell CycleCell ProliferationComputer SimulationHumansMarkov ChainsMathematical ConceptsMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsNIH 3T3 CellsStochastic ProcessesTime FactorsCell cycleExponentially modified ErlangGillespie algorithmMarkovian representationStochastic simulation

Identifiers

PMID29030804
PMCPMC5709504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.