Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29030774›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine2018

Effects of growth hormone therapy on bone density and fracture risk in age-related osteoporosis in the absence of growth hormone deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maya Barake, Asma Arabi, Nancy Nakhoul, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan, Sarah El Ghandour, Anne Klibanski, Nicholas A Tritos

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Safety considerations for the clinical application of recombinant human growth hormone].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Therapeutic approaches to osteosarcopenia: insights for the clinician.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maya BarakeScholars in HeAlth Research Program, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. maya.barake@cmc.com.lb.ORCID 0000-0001-7891-7941
Asma ArabiScholars in HeAlth Research Program, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nancy NakhoulScholars in HeAlth Research Program, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ghada El-Hajj FuleihanScholars in HeAlth Research Program, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Sarah El GhandourBareen International Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Anne KlibanskiMassacchusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicholas A TritosMassacchusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
American University of Beirut · LBHarvard University · USAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LBEmirates Foundation · AE

Funding

Genetic and Metabolic Determinants of 25(OH)D levels at Baseline and One Year: Findings from a Dose Ranging Vitamin D trialD43TW009118 · FIC · AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT · PI FULEIHAN, GHADA ELHAJJ · 2012 to 2024
$2.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn adults, growth hormone deficiency (GHD) has been associated with low bone mineral density (BMD), an effect counteracted by growth hormone (GH) replacement. Whether GH is beneficial in adults with age-related bone loss and without hypopituitarism is unclear.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. We extracted and analyzed data according to the bone outcome included [bone mineral content (BMC), BMD, and bone biomarker, fracture risk]. We performed a meta-analysis when possible.

resultsWe included eight studies. Seven randomized 272 post-menopausal women, 61-69 years, to GH or control, for 6-24 months, and the eighth was an extension trial. Except for one study, all women received concurrent osteoporosis therapies. There was no significant effect of GH, as compared to control, on BMD at the lumbar spine (Weighted mean difference WMD = -0.01 [-0.04, 0.02]), total hip (WMD = 0 [-0.05, 0.06]) or femoral neck (WMD = 0 [-0.03, 0.04]). Similarly, no effect was seen on BMC. GH significantly increased the bone formation marker procollagen type-I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP) (WMD = 14.03 [2.68, 25.38]). GH resulted in a trend for increase in osteocalcin and in bone resorption markers. Patients who received GH had a significant decrease in fracture risk as compared to control (RR = 0.63 [0.46, 0.87]). Reported adverse events were not major, mostly related to fluid retention.

conclusionGH may not improve bone density in women with age-related bone loss but may decrease fracture risk. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to further explore these findings in both genders, and to investigate the effect of GH on bone quality.

Indexed as

AgedBone DensityFemaleFractures, BoneHormone Replacement TherapyHuman Growth HormoneHumansHypopituitarismMiddle AgedOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsHuman Growth HormoneBone mineral densityFractureGrowth hormoneMeta-analysisOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID29030774
OpenAlexW2763867737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.