Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29030757›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2018

Hemispheric asymmetry of liking for representational and abstract paintings.

Marcos Nadal, Susanna Schiavi, Zaira Cattaneo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcos NadalHuman Evolution and Cognition Group, IFISC, University of the Balearic Islands - CSIC, Palma, Spain. marcos.nadal@uib.es.
Susanna SchiaviDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Zaira CattaneoDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.

Funding

Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research RBFR12F0BDSpanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad PSI2016-77327-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the neural correlates of the appreciation of aesthetic qualities have been the target of much research in the past decade, few experiments have explored the hemispheric asymmetries in underlying processes. In this study, we used a divided visual field paradigm to test for hemispheric asymmetries in men and women's preference for abstract and representational artworks. Both male and female participants liked representational paintings more when presented in the right visual field, whereas preference for abstract paintings was unaffected by presentation hemifield. We hypothesize that this result reflects a facilitation of the sort of visual processes relevant to laypeople's liking for art-specifically, local processing of highly informative object features-when artworks are presented in the right visual field, given the left hemisphere's advantage in processing such features.

Indexed as

EstheticsPaintingsAdultChoice BehaviorFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleVisual FieldsVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAestheticsArtDivided visual fieldHemispheric dominanceLateralizationLiking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.