Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29030424›Full record

ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2018

Stable coronary syndromes: pathophysiology, diagnostic advances and therapeutic need.

Thomas J Ford, David Corcoran, Colin Berry

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03477890 (Angina in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Disease as Revealed by CT Coronary Angiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03477890 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Angina in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Disease as Revealed by CT Coronary Angiography (Cor-CTCA): an Observational Cohort Study Involving Coronary Function Tests and a Nested Randomised Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS National Waiting Times Centre BoardRan2017 to 2033Enrolled250ConditionsAngina, Stable, Angina Pectoris, Variant, Microvascular AnginaArmsStratified medicine involving a diagnostic intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exercise Prescription in Cardio-Oncology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Comprehensive diagnosis in chronic coronary syndromes combining angiography and intracoronary testing: the AID-ANGIO study.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas J FordBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID orcid.org/0000-0003-4009-6652
David CorcoranBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Colin BerryBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4009-6652

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/14/15/30661British Heart Foundation FS/17/26/32744British Heart Foundation FS172632744British Heart Foundation PG/11/55/28999British Heart Foundation PG-17-25-32884British Heart Foundation PG/17/25/32884British Heart Foundation RE/13/5/30177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnostic management of patients with angina pectoris typically centres on the detection of obstructive epicardial CAD, which aligns with evidence-based treatment options that include medical therapy and myocardial revascularisation. This clinical paradigm fails to account for the considerable proportion (approximately one-third) of patients with angina in whom obstructive CAD is excluded. This common scenario presents a diagnostic conundrum whereby angina occurs but there is no obstructive CAD (ischaemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease-INOCA). We review new insights into the pathophysiology of angina whereby myocardial ischaemia results from a deficient supply of oxygenated blood to the myocardium, due to various combinations of focal or diffuse epicardial disease (macrovascular), microvascular dysfunction or both. Macrovascular disease may be due to the presence of obstructive CAD secondary to atherosclerosis, or may be dynamic due to a functional disorder (eg, coronary artery spasm, myocardial bridging). Pathophysiology of coronary microvascular disease may involve anatomical abnormalities resulting in increased coronary resistance, or functional abnormalities resulting in abnormal vasomotor tone. We consider novel clinical diagnostic techniques enabling new insights into the causes of angina and appraise the need for improved therapeutic options for patients with INOCA. We conclude that the taxonomy of stable CAD could improve to better reflect the heterogeneous pathophysiology of the coronary circulation. We propose the term 'stable coronary syndromes' (SCS), which aligns with the well-established terminology for 'acute coronary syndromes'. SCS subtends a clinically relevant classification that more fully encompasses the different diseases of the epicardial and microvascular coronary circulation.

Indexed as

Angina, StableCardiac Imaging TechniquesDisease ManagementHumansRisk Factorscardiac computer tomographic (ct) imagingcardiac magnetic resonance (cmr) imagingcardiac risk factors and preventionchronic coronary diseasepharmacology

Identifiers

PMID29030424
PMCPMC5861393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.