Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29030283›Full record

ReviewAcademic radiology2018

Logistics of Three-dimensional Printing: Primer for Radiologists.

Taryn Hodgdon, Raman Danrad, Midhir J Patel, Stacy E Smith, Michael L Richardson, David H Ballard, Sayed Ali, Anthony Paul Trace, Carolynn M DeBenedectis, Matthew E Zygmont and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Imagine all you want, but….Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022
    Article
  5. The Mesentery in Complete Mesocolic Excision.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. 3D Printing Applications for Radiology: An Overview.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Taryn HodgdonDepartment of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada. Electronic address: tahodgdon@toh.ca.
Raman DanradDepartment of Radiology, LSU Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Los Angeles.
Midhir J PatelDepartment of Radiology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.
Stacy E SmithDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael L RichardsonDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
David H BallardMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sayed AliDepartment of Radiology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anthony Paul TraceDepartment of Radiology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Carolynn M DeBenedectisDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Matthew E ZygmontDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia.
Leon LenchikDepartment of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Summer J DeckerDepartment of Radiology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.

Funding

Training OPportunities in Translational Imaging Education and Research (TOP-TIER)T32EB021955 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Hongyu An, Joseph Edward Ippolito · 2017 to 2026
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB021955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Task Force on three-dimensional (3D) printing presents a review of the logistic considerations for establishing a clinical service using this new technology, specifically focused on implications for radiology. Specific topics include printer selection for 3D printing, software selection, creating a 3D model for printing, providing a 3D printing service, research directions, and opportunities for radiologists to be involved in 3D printing. A thorough understanding of the technology and its capabilities is necessary as the field of 3D printing continues to grow. Radiologists are in the unique position to guide this emerging technology and its use in the clinical arena.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalRadiologyHumansResearchSoftware3D modeling3D printinglogisticsradiologythree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID29030283
PMCPMC6467477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.