Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29030051›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of pathology2018

Determinants of Axon Growth, Plasticity, and Regeneration in the Context of Spinal Cord Injury.

Angela R Filous, Jan M Schwab

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Role of DNA Methylation in Stroke Recovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Extracellular Matrix in Neural Plasticity and Regeneration.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela R FilousSpinal Cord Injury Division, Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: angela.filous@osumc.edu.
Jan M SchwabSpinal Cord Injury Division, Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, Spinal Cord Injury Medicine, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: jan.schwab@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms that underlie recovery after injury of the central nervous system have rarely been definitively established. Axon regrowth remains the major prerequisite for plasticity, regeneration, circuit formation, and eventually functional recovery. The attributed functional relevance of axon regrowth, however, will depend on several subsequent conditional neurobiological modifications, including myelination and synapse formation, but also pruning of aberrant connectivity. Despite the ability to revamp axon outgrowth by altering an increasing number of extracellular and intracellular targets, disentangling which axons are responsible for the recovery of function from those that are functionally silent, or even contributing to aberrant functions, represents a pertinent void in our understanding, challenging the intuitive translational link between anatomical and functional regeneration. Anatomic hallmarks of regeneration are not static and are largely activity dependent. Herein, we survey mechanisms leading to the formation of dystrophic growth cone at the injured axonal tip, the subsequent axonal dieback, and the molecular determinants of axon growth, plasticity, and regeneration in the context of spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsGrowth ConesNerve RegenerationNeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID29030051
PMCPMC7338909
OpenAlexW2762435595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.