ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
A method for named entity normalization in biomedical articles: application to diseases and plants.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- IID-KG: An ontology-aligned literature-derived knowledge graph for infectious and immune-mediated diseases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Plant attribute extraction: An enhancing three-stage deep learning model for relational triple extraction.PloS one · 2025Article
- HunFlair2 in a cross-corpus evaluation of biomedical named entity recognition and normalization tools.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- NetMe 2.0: a web-based platform for extracting and modeling knowledge from biomedical literature as a labeled graph.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- AIONER: all-in-one scheme-based biomedical named entity recognition using deep learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Edge Weight Updating Neural Network for Named Entity Normalization.Neural processing letters · 2022Article
- Surgical procedure long terms recognition from Chinese literature incorporating structural feature.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Plant phenotype relationship corpus for biomedical relationships between plants and phenotypes.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Public data sources for regulatory genomic features.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2021Article
- Extracting knowledge networks from plant scientific literature: potato tuber flesh color as an exemplary trait.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Named entity recognition on bio-medical literature documents using hybrid based approach.Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing · 2021Article
- Natural Language Processing Algorithms for Normalizing Expressions of Synonymous Symptoms in Traditional Chinese Medicine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- BENTO: A Visual Platform for Building Clinical NLP Pipelines Based on CodaLab.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · 2020Article
- Biomedical named entity recognition using deep neural networks with contextual information.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Linking entities through an ontology using word embeddings and syntactic re-ranking.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A Pattern-Based Method for Medical Entity Recognition From Chinese Diagnostic Imaging Text.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2019Article
- Improving the Path from Diagnoses to Documentation: A Cognitive Review Tool for Clinical Notes and Administrative Records.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn biomedical articles, a named entity recognition (NER) technique that identifies entity names from texts is an important element for extracting biological knowledge from articles. After NER is applied to articles, the next step is to normalize the identified names into standard concepts (i.e., disease names are mapped to the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings disease terms). In biomedical articles, many entity normalization methods rely on domain-specific dictionaries for resolving synonyms and abbreviations. However, the dictionaries are not comprehensive except for some entities such as genes. In recent years, biomedical articles have accumulated rapidly, and neural network-based algorithms that incorporate a large amount of unlabeled data have shown considerable success in several natural language processing problems.
resultsIn this study, we propose an approach for normalizing biological entities, such as disease names and plant names, by using word embeddings to represent semantic spaces. For diseases, training data from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) disease corpus and unlabeled data from PubMed abstracts were used to construct word representations. For plants, a training corpus that we manually constructed and unlabeled PubMed abstracts were used to represent word vectors. We showed that the proposed approach performed better than the use of only the training corpus or only the unlabeled data and showed that the normalization accuracy was improved by using our model even when the dictionaries were not comprehensive. We obtained F-scores of 0.808 and 0.690 for normalizing the NCBI disease corpus and manually constructed plant corpus, respectively. We further evaluated our approach using a data set in the disease normalization task of the BioCreative V challenge. When only the disease corpus was used as a dictionary, our approach significantly outperformed the best system of the task.
conclusionsThe proposed approach shows robust performance for normalizing biological entities. The manually constructed plant corpus and the proposed model are available at http://gcancer.org/plant and http://gcancer.org/normalization , respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.