Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29029469›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Genetic and environmental factors and serum hormones, and risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal Japanese women.

Jiazhi Guo, Aiko Sueta, Koshi Nakamura, Nobuyasu Yoshimoto, Motoi Baba, Naoko Ishida, Kanako Hagio, Tatsuya Toyama, Hirotaka Iwase, Akiko Tamakoshi and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anticancer activity of 1,25-(OH)OncoTargets and therapy · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Mouse models of SLC4-linked disorders of HCOAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jiazhi GuoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Aiko SuetaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Koshi NakamuraDepartment of Public Health, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Nobuyasu YoshimotoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Motoi BabaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Naoko IshidaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kanako HagioDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Tatsuya ToyamaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Hirotaka IwaseDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Akiko TamakoshiDepartment of Public Health, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroko YamashitaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Hokkaido University Hospital · JPKumamoto University · JPNagoya City University · JPHokkaido Institute of Public Health · JPHokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer incidence in Japanese women has more than tripled over the past two decades. We have previously shown that this marked increase is mostly due to an increase in the estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative subtype. We conducted a case-control study; ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients who were diagnosed since 2011 and women without disease were recruited. Environmental factors, serum levels of testosterone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and common genetic variants reported as predictors of ER-positive breast cancer or found in Asian women were evaluated between patients and controls in pre- and postmenopausal women. To identify important risk predictors, risk prediction models were created by logistic regression models. In premenopausal women, two environmental factors (history of breastfeeding, and history of benign breast disease) and four genetic variants (TOX3-rs3803662, ESR1-rs2046210, 8q24-rs13281615, and SLC4A7-rs4973768) were considered to be risk predictors, whereas three environmental factors (body mass index, history of breastfeeding, and hyperlipidemia), serum levels of testosterone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and two genetic variants (TOX3-rs3803662 and ESR1-rs2046210) were identified as risk predictors. Inclusion of common genetic variants and serum hormone measurements as well as environmental factors improved risk assessment models. The decline in the birthrate according to recent changes of lifestyle might be the main cause of the recent notable increase in the incidence of ER-positive breast cancer in Japanese women.

Indexed as

25-hydroxyvitamin Dbreast cancerestrogen receptor-positivegenetic variantsrisk predictor

Identifiers

PMID29029469
PMCPMC5630369
OpenAlexW2744428504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.