Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29029420›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Generation and evaluation of antibody agents for molecular imaging of CD44v6-expressing cancers.

Anna-Karin Haylock, Johan Nilvebrant, Anja Mortensen, Irina Velikyan, Marika Nestor, Ronny Falk

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Imaging Early-Stage Metastases Using anMolecular imaging and biology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna-Karin HaylockDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan NilvebrantDivision of Protein Technology, School of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anja MortensenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Irina VelikyanDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Marika NestorDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ronny FalkDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to generate and characterize scFv antibodies directed to human CD44v6, as well as to radiolabel and evaluate top candidates MATERIALS AND

methodsPhage display selections were used to isolate CD44v6-specific scFvs. A chain shuffling strategy was employed for affinity maturation based on a set of CD44v6-specific first-generation clones. Two second-generation scFv clones were then chosen for labeling with

resultsTwo affinity-matured clones, CD44v6-scFv-A11 and CD44v6-scFv-H12, displayed promising binding kinetics. Seven out of eight radiolabeled conjugates demonstrated CD44v6-specific binding.

conclusionThe single chain fragments, CD44v6-scFv-A11 and CD44v6-scFv-H12 specifically bind to CD44v6, and the radiolabeled counterparts provide high tumor-to-blood ratios and fast clearance from organs and blood. We conclude that radioiodinated CD44v6-scFv-A11 and CD44v6-scFv-H12 possess features highly suitable for stringent molecular imaging.

Indexed as

CD44v6molecular imagingrecombinant antibody formatsscFvsquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29029420
PMCPMC5630320
OpenAlexW2615777511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.