Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29029274›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2017

Mutation-Driven Parallel Evolution during Viral Adaptation.

Andrew M Sackman, Lindsey W McGee, Anneliese J Morrison, Jessica Pierce, Jeremy Anisman, Hunter Hamilton, Stephanie Sanderbeck, Cayla Newman, Darin R Rokyta

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  8. Evolutionary repeatability of emergent properties of ecological communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Mutation bias and the predictability of evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mutation bias shapes the spectrum of adaptive substitutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew M SackmanDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Lindsey W McGeeDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Anneliese J MorrisonDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Jessica PierceDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Jeremy AnismanDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Hunter HamiltonDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Stephanie SanderbeckDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Cayla NewmanDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Darin R RokytaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Florida State University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICST32GM007759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NOLEN, BRADLEY J · 1985 to 2021
$8.5M
Pleiotropy, Epistasis, and the Biophysical Adaptation of ssDNA BacteriophagesR01GM099723 · NIGMS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROKYTA, DARIN R · 2012 to 2016
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099723NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convergent evolution has been demonstrated across all levels of biological organization, from parallel nucleotide substitutions to convergent evolution of complex phenotypes, but whether instances of convergence are the result of selection repeatedly finding the same optimal solution to a recurring problem or are the product of mutational biases remains unsettled. We generated 20 replicate lineages allowed to fix a single mutation from each of four bacteriophage genotypes under identical selective regimes to test for parallel changes within and across genotypes at the levels of mutational effect distributions and gene, protein, amino acid, and nucleotide changes. All four genotypes shared a distribution of beneficial mutational effects best approximated by a distribution with a finite upper bound. Parallel adaptation was high at the protein, gene, amino acid, and nucleotide levels, both within and among phage genotypes, with the most common first-step mutation in each background fixing on an average in 7 of 20 replicates and half of the substitutions in two of the four genotypes occurring at shared sites. Remarkably, the mutation of largest beneficial effect that fixed for each genotype was never the most common, as would be expected if parallelism were driven by selection. In fact, the mutation of smallest benefit for each genotype fixed in a total of 7 of 80 lineages, equally as often as the mutation of largest benefit, leading us to conclude that adaptation was largely mutation-driven, such that mutational biases led to frequent parallel fixation of mutations of suboptimal effect.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBacteriophagesBiological EvolutionDirected Molecular EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenotypeMutationPhenotypeSelection, Geneticconvergencedistribution of beneficial fitness effectsexperimental evolutiongenetics of adaptationmutation-driven evolutionparallel evolution

Identifiers

PMID29029274
PMCPMC5850295
OpenAlexW2760246611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.