ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018
Evaluation of universal versus genotype-guided efavirenz dose reduction in pregnant women using population pharmacokinetic modelling.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacogenetics of Breast Cancer Treatments: A Sub-Saharan Africa Perspective.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Could simulation methods solve the curse of sparse data within clinical studies of antibiotic resistance?JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2021Review
- Association ofPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLack of data on the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in pregnant women at the 400 mg reduced dose currently prevents universal roll-out. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was used to explore pharmacokinetic endpoints at 200, 400 and 600 mg daily doses in pregnant women stratified by CYP2B6 metabolic status.
methodsThe analysis was based on 252 plasma efavirenz concentrations from 77 pregnant women (77 sparse, 175 intensive) who received antiretroviral regimens containing 600 mg of efavirenz. The model was developed using NONMEM®. The effect of genetics was investigated and concentration-time courses at steady-state were simulated for individuals (n = 1000 each) classified as CYP2B6 slow, intermediate and fast metabolizers at 200, 400 and 600 mg daily doses.
resultsAt a 400 mg reduced dose, predicted mean (90% CI) mid-dose efavirenz concentration (C12) was 2.24 μg/mL (0.89-4.18) in pregnant women classified as slow metabolizers, compared with 0.87 μg/mL (0.34-1.64) in intermediate metabolizers and 0.78 μg/mL (0.30-1.47) in fast metabolizers. C12 was below the 0.47 μg/mL threshold determined within the ENCORE 1 trial in 10% at 400 mg, 4.6% at 600 mg and 3.4% with genotype-guided dosing. The 4.0 μg/mL toxicity threshold was exceeded in 4.6% at 400 mg, 13.5% at 600 mg and 5.2% with genotype-guided dosing.
conclusionsThese data provide context for the ongoing debate about reduction in efavirenz dose to 400 mg during pregnancy and should be interpreted alongside the lower toxicity expected with the lower dose. Additional research is required to investigate genotype-guided dose reduction in pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.