Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29029068›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2017

Considering health equity when moving from evidence-based guideline recommendations to implementation: a case study from an upper-middle income country on the GRADE approach.

Javier Eslava-Schmalbach, Paola Mosquera, Juan Pablo Alzate, Kevin Pottie, Vivian Welch, Elie A Akl, Janet Jull, Eddy Lang, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Rachel Morton and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Javier Eslava-SchmalbachEquity-in-Health Group, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Cra 30 45-03, University Campus, Bogota, Colombia.
Paola MosqueraEpidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 901?87 Umeå, Sweden.
Juan Pablo AlzateEquity-in-Health Group, Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Kevin PottieBruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Avenue, Room 312, Ottawa, ON K1R 7G5, Canada.
Vivian WelchBruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Avenue, Room 312, Ottawa, ON K1R 7G5, Canada.
Elie A AklDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Janet JullBruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Avenue, Room 312, Ottawa, ON K1R 7G5, Canada.
Eddy LangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Srinivasa Vittal KatikireddiMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G2 3QB, UK.
Rachel MortonSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006 NSW, Australia.
Lehana ThabaneMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Bev SheaClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Airton T SteinPublic Health Ufcspa, Ulbra, HTA of Conceicao Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Jasvinder SinghMedicine Service, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ivan D FlorezDepartment of Pediatrics, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Gordon GuyattDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Holger SchünemannDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Peter TugwellClinical Epidemiology Program, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SCAF/15/02Chief Scientist Office SPHSU15Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/13Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of evidence-based guidelines does not ensure their implementation and use in clinical practice or policy making. Inequities in health have been defined as those inequalities within or between populations that are avoidable, unnecessary and also unjust and unfair. Evidence-based clinical practice and public health guidelines ('guidelines') can be used to target health inequities experienced by disadvantaged populations, although guidelines may unintentionally increase health inequities. For this reason, there is a need for evidence-based clinical practice and public health guidelines to intentionally target health inequities experienced by disadvantaged populations. Current guideline development processes do not include steps for planned implementation of equity-focused guidelines. This article describes nine steps that provide guidance for consideration of equity during guideline implementation. A critical appraisal of the literature followed by a process to build expert consensus was undertaken to define how to include consideration of equity issues during the specific GRADE guideline development process. Using a case study from Colombia we describe nine steps that were used to implement equity-focused GRADE recommendations: (1) identification of disadvantaged groups, (2) quantification of current health inequities, (3) development of equity-sensitive recommendations, (4) identification of key actors for implementation of equity-focused recommendations, (5) identification of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of equity-focused recommendations, (6) development of an equity strategy to be included in the implementation plan, (7) assessment of resources and incentives, (8) development of a communication strategy to support an equity focus and (9) development of monitoring and evaluation strategies. This case study can be used as model for implementing clinical practice guidelines, taking into account equity issues during guideline development and implementation.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeVulnerable PopulationsColombiaHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Plan ImplementationHumansOrganizational Case StudiesPractice Guidelines as TopicclinicalequityHealth inequalitiesimplementationpractice guidelines

Identifiers

PMID29029068
PMCPMC5886248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.