Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29028974›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018

Temporal Dynamics of Human Frontal and Cingulate Neural Activity During Conflict and Cognitive Control.

Eleonora Bartoli, Christopher R Conner, Cihan M Kadipasaoglu, Sudha Yellapantula, Matthew J Rollo, Cameron S Carter, Nitin Tandon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biophysical and Architectural Mechanisms of Subthalamic Theta under Response Conflict.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eleonora BartoliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Christopher R ConnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Cihan M KadipasaogluDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Sudha YellapantulaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Matthew J RolloDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Cameron S CarterCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Nitin TandonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USRice University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Brain Networks of Noun GenerationR01DC014589 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TANDON, NITIN · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control refers to the ability to produce flexible, goal-oriented behavior in the face of changing task demands and conflicting response tendencies. A classic cognitive control experiment is the Stroop-color naming task, which requires participants to name the color in which a word is written while inhibiting the tendency to read the word. By comparing stimuli with conflicting word-color associations to congruent ones, control processes over response tendencies can be isolated. We assessed the spatial specificity and temporal dynamics in the theta and gamma bands for regions engaged in detecting and resolving conflict in a cohort of 13 patients using a combination of high-resolution surface and depth recordings. We show that cognitive control manifests as a sustained increase in gamma band power, which correlates with response time. Conflict elicits a sustained gamma power increase but a transient theta power increase, specifically localized to the left cingulate sulcus and bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Additionally, activity in DLPFC is affected by trial-by-trial modulation of cognitive control (the Gratton effect). Altogether, the sustained local neural activity in dorsolateral and medial regions is what determines the timing of the correct response.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalGamma RhythmTheta RhythmAdultExecutive FunctionFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMalePrefrontal CortexStroop TestTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29028974
PMCPMC6188556
OpenAlexW2757608918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.