Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29028877›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

RINspector: a Cytoscape app for centrality analyses and DynaMine flexibility prediction.

Guillaume Brysbaert, Kevin Lorgouilloux, Wim F Vranken, Marc F Lensink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Theta-Defensins to Counter COVID-19 as Furin Inhibitors:Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guillaume BrysbaertUniversity of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, F-59000 Lille, France.
Kevin LorgouillouxUniversity of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, F-59000 Lille, France.
Wim F VrankenInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, ULB/VUB, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Marc F LensinkUniversity of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, F-59000 Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProtein function is directly related to amino acid residue composition and the dynamics of these residues. Centrality analyses based on residue interaction networks permit to identify key residues in a protein that are important for its fold or function. Such central residues and their environment constitute suitable targets for mutagenesis experiments. Predicted flexibility and changes in flexibility upon mutation provide valuable additional information for the design of such experiments.

resultsWe combined centrality analyses with DynaMine flexibility predictions in a Cytoscape app called RINspector. The app performs centrality analyses and directly visualizes the results on a graph of predicted residue flexibility. In addition, the effect of mutations on local flexibility can be calculated. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The app is publicly available in the Cytoscape app store. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Identifiers

PMID29028877
PMCPMC5860209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.