Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29028869›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2019

MG-RAST version 4-lessons learned from a decade of low-budget ultra-high-throughput metagenome analysis.

Folker Meyer, Saurabh Bagchi, Somali Chaterji, Wolfgang Gerlach, Ananth Grama, Travis Harrison, Tobias Paczian, William L Trimble, Andreas Wilke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Easy and interactive taxonomic profiling with Metabuli App.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Visualizing metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data: A comprehensive review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Folker Meyer
Saurabh Bagchi
Somali Chaterji
Wolfgang Gerlach
Ananth Grama
Travis Harrison
Tobias Paczian
William L Trimble
Andreas Wilke

Funding

ODF: Support infrastructure for NextGen sequence storage analysis and mgtU01HG006537 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WHITE, OWEN R · 2012 to 2016
$4.1M
Continued Development and Maintenance of the MG-RAST Metagenomics PipelineR01AI123037 · NIAID · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI GRAMA, ANANTH, MEYER, FOLKER · 2016 to 2020
$3.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006537NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As technologies change, MG-RAST is adapting. Newly available software is being included to improve accuracy and performance. As a computational service constantly running large volume scientific workflows, MG-RAST is the right location to perform benchmarking and implement algorithmic or platform improvements, in many cases involving trade-offs between specificity, sensitivity and run-time cost. The work in [Glass EM, Dribinsky Y, Yilmaz P, et al. ISME J 2014;8:1-3] is an example; we use existing well-studied data sets as gold standards representing different environments and different technologies to evaluate any changes to the pipeline. Currently, we use well-understood data sets in MG-RAST as platform for benchmarking. The use of artificial data sets for pipeline performance optimization has not added value, as these data sets are not presenting the same challenges as real-world data sets. In addition, the MG-RAST team welcomes suggestions for improvements of the workflow. We are currently working on versions 4.02 and 4.1, both of which contain significant input from the community and our partners that will enable double barcoding, stronger inferences supported by longer-read technologies, and will increase throughput while maintaining sensitivity by using Diamond and SortMeRNA. On the technical platform side, the MG-RAST team intends to support the Common Workflow Language as a standard to specify bioinformatics workflows, both to facilitate development and efficient high-performance implementation of the community's data analysis tasks.

Indexed as

MetagenomeSoftwareAlgorithmsBudgetsComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInternetMetagenomicsSequence Analysis, DNAUser-Computer InterfaceWorkflowclouddistributed workflowsmetagenome analysis

Identifiers

PMID29028869
PMCPMC6781595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.